Skip to main content

Question of the Day

Earlier this year I wrote a piece about some developments in hydrogen production, particularly promising in the context of fueling combustion engines in automobiles.

In part, I raised some questions about the push towards EV's (electric vehicles), in particular that the electricity will necessarily (in the forseeable future) be derived from the same polluting resources (primarily coal) as the rest of the grid is, and would put an enormous new strain on renewable energy resources slowly coming on line, should millions of these vehicles eventually come into use.

The question is a practical one and asked in all seriousness :

Given that EV's will be best suited to urban environments, with short-range driving and the worst vehicle emissions concentrations, what of the millions of households for which vehicles must be parked on the street or "off-site", nowhere near the owner's source (or possibly any readily-accessible source) of electricity, such as from the owners' homes/dwellings/businesses?

An example is my own home, an old Wilmington "town house" that, like most such houses all over Wilmington, is at least 50 feet from the street parking in front to the nearest electrical outlet inside. How could I possibly re-charge an EV, even if I could secure a space directly in front of my home - which usually happens about 5-10% of the time in free-for-all that is city street parking?

I don't see people running extension cords out to the street, even if they could guarantee parking in front of their place. I have not seen any simple, practical solutions to providing electricity wherever drivers end up having to park their EV's.

Not that it isn't technically possible, but it would likely cost trillions, born by unknown parties at this point, to create ubiquitous urban energy infrastructures to practically accommodate EV re-charging at street level in cities the world-over.

Imagine this problem in a city the scale of NY, with a lot of dense vertical housing, and the problem becomes exponentially more complicated.

An interesting article out of Belgium breaks down the technical aspects of EV charging, but seems to raise more questions about the practicality of mass use of EV's than it answers and it appears to have been written almost 10 years ago.

Sometimes the seemingly more mundane practical aspects of mass-deploying alternative technologies like EV's can be highly-limiting, if not killer, issues despite the best intentions of their engineers. I noted just such an issue in my previous linked post, wondering aloud what solution is conceivable to address when some drivers, careless or otherwise, inevitably run out of battery power on the roadside.

These EV drivers can't just dump a gallon into the tank in short order, and be on their way. (I can only imagine how much portable stored power would be necessary if "fast-charging" was even possible in such scenarios).

The possibility of integrating photovoltaics (solar conductors) could hold promise, but is nowhere near realization for conventional EV power needs.

EV's will require much closer attention, monitoring, and forward-planning by their users...something not exactly commonplace in the vast majority of vehicle owners/drivers....but perhaps people will adjust and deal with the additional hassles/issues as best they can.

Any thoughts or information to share?

Comments

pandora said…
Tricky situation, and I don't have the answer. Here's a positive spin... yet another industry waiting to spin off electric vehicles.

My first thought was stations - like parking meters, only more attractive - placed on city streets. That's off the top of my head, so I haven't really considered how it would work.

Good question.
Tyler Nixon said…
We may find EV's are best limited to fleet uiage and suburban dwellers, where charging can be done in your driveway.

The stations you mention is an obvious solution, but not easily deployed everywhere, nor cheaply. Just think of Wilmington...who would pay for it, and how would you access it if you are the whim of available parking near these stations?

This a huge problem inherent in tying mobile devices, especially of large energy replenishment demands, to a type of energy that can neither be "pumped in" quickly nor is detachable from its source (such as a fuel tank allows).

In the big scheme, just think of trying to charge your cell phone away from home, out and about, and multiply such an impact far more profoundly...and more expensively, given the amount of electricity demanded to charge EV's.

I do agree with you that it could spin off novel solutions and innovations as the industry develops...
pandora said…
I see you points, Tyler, and agree that EVs may be limited to fleet usage and suburban dwellers... in the beginning.

If demand is there, someone - somewhere - will figure out how to meet it! I just can't see a potentially profitable new industry writing off entire sections of the population - especially a demographic (city dwellers) that's an easy buy in for their product.

How this will happen, I have no idea. Then again, I had no idea that post-it notes would one day consume so much aisle space at Staples!
Anonymous said…
One idea I've read about is to have service stations that sell/install a charged battery for the depleted battery, kind of like a netflix exchange.

Perry Hood
Nancy Willing said…
Perry, one idea I've read about was having 'exchange stations' where you just take a few minutes to dump the battery needing a charge for one that's ready to go.

Tyler - good article. The significant roadblock of city parking/plugging in isn't mentioned any where else I've seen.
Delaware Watch said…
Great points, Tyler. Proof that sometimes the devil is in the details.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?