Skip to main content

A genuine confusion regarding President Obama and health care reform

On 13 June, President Obama said this of his objectives in health care reform:

"if doctors have incentives to provide the best care, instead of more care, we can help Americans avoid unnecessary hospital stays, treatments and tests that drive up costs."


Now here's my confusion: There are several reasons advanced for the need for health care reform, the primary of which are generally:

1) Millions of uninsured or under-insured Americans

2) Soaring premiums

3) The refusal of health insurance companies to authorize necessary tests, treatments, or hospital stays.

Number three accounts for [by my rough estimate] nearly 75% of the anecdotal horror stories about health care in America: refusing meds, nixing treatments, demanding that you leave the hospital early.

But it was Tom Baker in his highly regarded The Medical Malpractice Myth who argued that neither HMOs nor malpractice threats are causing physicians to order too many tests or engage in too many procedures. Instead, Baker argues, there actually aren't enough tests or procedures being done:

There is lots of talk about the heavy burden that “defensive medicine” imposes on health costs, but the research shows this is not true.


Yet what Mr. Obama appears to be advocating is fewer tests, fewer procedures, and fewer hospital stays.

I realize that he is making the best practices argument, but it seems to me that there is an inherent contradiction in his position.

Maybe it's just me.

Comments

Nancy said…
The confusion stems from the redundancy within the insurance system. I think he is talking about fraudulant practices.

Have had several family question why such and such was done or overdone etc...

There is no reform without revamping process and questioning fraud. Nor should we let the malpractice problems and tort go uncapped.

God forbid we go forward with a government plan that doesn't catch how physicians and insurance companies scam the consumer... especially those with medicaid and medicare.
tom said…
This is a bit off topic, but has potential to make the Senate debates on the Health Care bill a bit more interesting:

Senator Tom Coburn proposed an amendment, which was adopted by the Senate Health Committee, to require members of Congress to switch from their current health insurance plans to any government provided insurance scheme that's created as part of proposed health care legislation.

I think it should be a general requirement that members of Congress "eat their own dog food" instead of routinely exempting themselves from the laws they impose on the rest of us.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?