Skip to main content

A genuine confusion regarding President Obama and health care reform

On 13 June, President Obama said this of his objectives in health care reform:

"if doctors have incentives to provide the best care, instead of more care, we can help Americans avoid unnecessary hospital stays, treatments and tests that drive up costs."


Now here's my confusion: There are several reasons advanced for the need for health care reform, the primary of which are generally:

1) Millions of uninsured or under-insured Americans

2) Soaring premiums

3) The refusal of health insurance companies to authorize necessary tests, treatments, or hospital stays.

Number three accounts for [by my rough estimate] nearly 75% of the anecdotal horror stories about health care in America: refusing meds, nixing treatments, demanding that you leave the hospital early.

But it was Tom Baker in his highly regarded The Medical Malpractice Myth who argued that neither HMOs nor malpractice threats are causing physicians to order too many tests or engage in too many procedures. Instead, Baker argues, there actually aren't enough tests or procedures being done:

There is lots of talk about the heavy burden that “defensive medicine” imposes on health costs, but the research shows this is not true.


Yet what Mr. Obama appears to be advocating is fewer tests, fewer procedures, and fewer hospital stays.

I realize that he is making the best practices argument, but it seems to me that there is an inherent contradiction in his position.

Maybe it's just me.

Comments

Nancy said…
The confusion stems from the redundancy within the insurance system. I think he is talking about fraudulant practices.

Have had several family question why such and such was done or overdone etc...

There is no reform without revamping process and questioning fraud. Nor should we let the malpractice problems and tort go uncapped.

God forbid we go forward with a government plan that doesn't catch how physicians and insurance companies scam the consumer... especially those with medicaid and medicare.
tom said…
This is a bit off topic, but has potential to make the Senate debates on the Health Care bill a bit more interesting:

Senator Tom Coburn proposed an amendment, which was adopted by the Senate Health Committee, to require members of Congress to switch from their current health insurance plans to any government provided insurance scheme that's created as part of proposed health care legislation.

I think it should be a general requirement that members of Congress "eat their own dog food" instead of routinely exempting themselves from the laws they impose on the rest of us.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba