Skip to main content

If you 'd like to do anecdotal arguments for or against nationalized health care...

... then you should talk to my Dad.

Dad's 81, Mom's 78. When we talked last night he--shall we say--waxed eloquent about the idea that Medicare is the standard by which we should judge the government's performance as a health insurance provider.

First off, Dad points out, after a lifetime of paying Medicare taxes, the coverage is hardly free.

"They take $86 a month for each of us out of our Social Security payments," he notes. "Then the Medicare only covers about 60% of my out-of-pocket costs, so I had to get the supplemental insurance. We got the cheapest one we could find--bare bones coverage that leaves out a number of things we still have to pay for. That costs another $176 a month. And we didn't take the prescription drug coverage because that would have been at least another $120 a month. We just couldn't afford it."

Let's crunch those numbers: $86 + $86 + $176 + $120 = $468/month, or $5,616/year.

Above that, he estimates that--not counting prescriptions--he ends up with roughly another $3 - $4,000 of out-of-pocket medical expenses per year. Some of that occurs because the doctor he has seen for his joint problems for nearly two decades finally made the tough decision to stop accepting Medicare, so if Dad wants to keep seeing the physician he trusts (a major promise of the new reforms, right?) he has to pay the freight himself.

My Dad is a retired public school teacher: retired with a disability after twenty-eight years (he's legally blind); Mom stayed at home through most of those years. They're contemplating the move into assisted-care now, and as a bridge to that end they investigated having a home health aide come in a couple times a week to assist with the heavier housework.

Medicare pays for that, right?

Well, yes, sort of. Except, as the nice but oh-so-sorrowful woman at the benefits office explained, to qualify for the home health aide Mom would have to give up her driver's license. "We can't provide in-home services for people who can drive."

Of course, if Mom gave up her driver's license they'd have no way to shop ... or make doctor's appointments.

Would Medicare do that? "No, but there are some volunteer programs that might be able to help you out once a week or so."

The common meme/narrative/talking point most often extended by the advocates of single-payer or the public option is that the best case would resemble "Medicare for everybody."

But to have "Medicare for everybody," as President Obama now points out, the government will have to cut Medicare costs yet again.

To Dad what that means is pretty clear: "There will be more doctors who won't take my Medicare, and they'll raise my premiums and co-pays."

Anecdotal? Sure. Opinionated? Well, he is my Dad--what did you expect?

Comments

I wonder what the rationale is for not providing home help when a person can drive. There are people who have no problem driving put can't physically operate a vacuum cleaner.

Almost as if they want to keep people as prisoners and make them as dependent as possible on "the system".
Miko said…
H.L. Mencken once wrote: "Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right."

The same principle is at work in the health care debate: left-statists focus on how poorly the state-granted quasi-private monopoly system works, while right-statists focus on how poorly the state-granted quasi-public monopoly system works. And both are absolutely right, yet simultaneously wrong as they seem to think that the poor functioning of one is an argument in favor of the other. What anecdotes should teach us here is that all monopolistic (i.e., anti-free market) systems are terrible.
Anonymous said…
My point exactly, everyone will be an "exception", under federal care, and then hate it. I am going to find a way to help you navigate this. Are your parents in Delaware, or another state?
Anon
Don't worry; I have plenty of experience navigating this ridiculous system--as does my Dad.

And since he spent considerable time saving and investing, he is one of the lucky ones who can afford this all. That's why we thought mac and cheese was a "meat dish" growing up.

And in actuality, surrender of a driver's license is not a pre-requisite according the Federal Medicare regulations--it's only how this particular idiot chose to interpret it. The standard is "extreme difficulty leaving home" which still allows for driving.

But if you were not equipped to do the research you'd never know you had just been given the wrong answer.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?