Skip to main content

Why I'm not a conservative; OR--why it is so lonely being a Libertarian advocate of smaller government

... because the GOP never--not just George W Bush never, but never even under Ronald Reagan--meant it.

And I have not found a piece of a rant that I more wish I'd written in a long time than this one from Matt Barganier:

If you think most self-described conservatives really hate Big Government, then you stopped paying attention sometime around, oh, the Nixon administration. Good God, man, if they hated Big Government, wouldn’t they at least dislike the most wasteful and intrusive government programs of them all, from the War on Terror to the War on Drugs? No, they love Big Government, from its big, fat boots to its big, fat head. Oh, they’re angry that some of the loot falls on the, um… undeserving, but that won’t stop them from sucking the teats of Social Security and Medicare to the shape and texture of a deflated football. They won’t abide tax increases, but they see no connection between those and deficit spending. And why should they? Just keep those F-22s coming, barkeep! The grandkids are buying!


What both Republicans and Democrats agree upon is that it is all right for government to keep sucking money out of the economy as long as it is their particular, obviously moral purpose for which it is used.

Then they trick us into arguing about the moral purposes rather than the original question of the morality of the whole process.

Comments

kavips said…
Hi Steve, Tyler, Matt. I'm back.

Small government.

I need your help. Where is a good model of small government functioning well in a complex society?

Here is my take. Small government worked well in the territories of the wild west but as complexity followed the original settlers into those areas, government had to grow to deal with its influx.

Point I am looking for. Is whether or not there is a way for small government to actually function in today's environment?

I'd like to see a model of it, but at this point, feel such is an impossible task. Can any of you over there, help?
kavips
I will take a shot at answering this (but it won't be immediate as I am out of town for most of the next ten days), but I need three clarifications from you to do so:

1. What kinds of measures for a complex society did you have in mind (size of population; level of technology; nation-state; etc.)? We'd all accept the US or any other large country as a complex society, but, just for example, would you accept a State or a large city? I guess what I am asking is whether you are using the term "complex society" as the stand-in for "nation-state" or not.

2. Do you want only current examples or could you see a relevant historical example qualifying if we can agree on what constitutes a complex society?

3. How do we define "small government" in some way that is not simply a comparative to the equally nebulous term "big government"? By the services it provides, the amount of tax money it takes in, what are you looking for?

I guess what I am saying is that I'm willing to spend the time helping to think about this issue in the way I think you are framing it, but I want a good set of parameters to work with.

For example (just for kicks and grins) building on your "wild west" example, the US arguably started with a "small government" and now has a "big government." At which historical point [or range] do you think the changeover occurred? How you would answer that question will tell me a lot about what you are looking for.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba