Skip to main content

The Obama administration reticence on naming a special prosecutor...

... has nothing to do with being thus far unaware of Bush administration policies on domestic surveillance or any failure of the MSM to cover this issue.

Yes, there are new details emerging, but we knew--we pretty much ALL knew--this was going on.

As much as I cavil about the national Libertarian Party, it was the only political party that really made this a significant issue during the 2008 elections. Again and again.

The ACLU has been pointing this out--in detail and along with other homeland security outrages--for years.

We knew. As a friend of mine said about two months ago, "There has been no greater stain on the reputation of American in modern memory than the fact that we torture."

Torture, surveillance, constitutional abuse.

And yet there continues to be surprise [now growing louder, I will admit], among our liberal and progressive friends that the Obama administration would rather leave this all in the past, and is reluctant to name a special prosecutor.

How could this be? It's not the political cost, as some have suggested. It's the fact--that the MSM and New Media have both documented thoroughly since Inauguration Day--that little has changed under the new administration.

The Obama administration has gone to court repeatedly relying on Bush-era legal theories to defend its conduct, has mooted its ability to detain people found innocent by the courts, and has even discussed executions without trials while pushing for a new cyber-security law that amounts to authorizing a complete government take-over of the internet. The Obama administration piously talks about shutting down Gitmo while maintaining abusive interrogation techniques at Bagram.

Want links? I've done this so many times that you can just start here.

The Obama administration therefore has this tiny little conundrum to solve before it can authorize a special prosecutor: how do you take the Bush administration to court for doing many things that you're still doing?

Comments

townie 76 said…
Steve,

I appreciate your sentiment, I to believe that the actions of the United States has besmirched and sullied our standing in the world; I also believe, that any investigation, in our current partisan atmosphere will end doing even more harm than good. There are unfortunately no adults who could handle this assignment with the deft ability that would ensure a true and impartial investigation. In the end we would be left with a greater partisan divide and we would establish a precedence which I am afraid, would undermine future Presidents and Administrations ability to act. I am afraid politically our nation, currently, lacks the maturity to undertake such an important action.

Hank Foresman

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?