Skip to main content

Father/daughter blogging the Markell-Carney Education Debate

(My twelve-year-old daughter's observations will be in bold. They are probably much better than mine, anyway.)

The setting: every education bureaucrat and party hack on the make all in one place. Damn few "just voters." Mike Protack standing in the third row, facing the crowd and trying to find someone to chat with.

The short version: Markell and Carney agree on the following: the DSTP should be scrapped; no funding parity for charters (but at least Dave Burris got his question in); Gifted/Talented education is a must; good teachers are a must; we love minorities and the disadvantaged; got to spend a lot more money on education; can't scrap property taxes; there are a lot of teachers in my family, and I learned to name-drop at a very early age....

My daughter liked Markell: sez the same thing as the other guy but at least he keeps me awake.

She's not so hot on Carney: he's kinda robotic and (kinda mean) but also a sissy.

Hey, I don't write her material.

On schools that "feel like family" (a Markell quote): maybe in Canada, but at [school name deleted] we detest our teachers.

On where they're going to find the money to pay for all this: they are going to steal it from New Jersey.

On year round schools: take away my summer? You aren't planning to vote for them, are you?

You could sum up this debate in one phrase: pandering to the education establishment (and, yes, Dave, to the DSEA as well).

You know who was never mentioned, either by the questioners or the candidates? Delaware's special needs students. I guess they don't figure too prominently into the plans of our would-be governors.

I came away from this debate with a profound feeling that public education in this State, despite all of Markell's talk about "bold leadership" and Carney's insistence on "learning at the desk," has become another soulless corporate product we're being sold by our ever-expanding government. All of our problems will be solved if we consolidate bus transportation and district purchasing to provide the money for every whatsis wish list our current educational leaders want to purchase.

My daughter's comment: when can we leave? all they do is promise everything to everybody and you know they won't do it.

It is probably obvious now that the wrong member of my family is in charge of this blog.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You could sum up this debate in one phrase: pandering to the education establishment (and, yes, Dave, to the DSEA as well).

*

This is what I have been taking away from their platforms. The land use positions are pure verbiage too. Very disappointing.

Steve and daughter, such a gas!
Delaware Watch said…
What a delightful post. It was awfully cute.

I love these:

"On where they're going to find the money to pay for all this: they are going to steal it from New Jersey."

That might be a good idea if we could get away w/ it.

"On year round schools: take away my summer? You aren't planning to vote for them, are you?

Now there is a young lady w/ the right priorities in place. She's correct in my view. Children need those summers.

Thanks for sharing those Steve. They have me smiling ear to ear. :)
I think your daughter is the smartest blogger in Delaware.

I wish our politicians would talk this way...that is, straight !

Kudos to you and your daughter...you make a good team.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...