Skip to main content

Hookers, Handmaidens & Client 9 (Elliot Spitzer)

While Becky the Girl in Shorts is sure someone wants to "swallow for Spitzer,"

http://girlinshortshorts.blogspot.com/search/label/Silda%20Wall%20Spitzer

and is equally sure that some misplaced cum could leave the soon-to-be-former Mrs. Spitzer in an even more enviable and powerful role than the “cigar and cum on the dress” impeachment of Bill Clinton left Hillary, I am not so sure.

All it proves to me is the fact that powerful men like to have powerful wives to handmaid them- when they cannot get handjobs from them.

It would have been better to compare Spitzer’s affair to the upcoming movie Love Ranch:

….The drama is inspired by the story of Joe and Sally Conforte, proprietors of the Mustang Ranch, the first legalized house of prostitution in Nevada. Boxer Oscar Bonavena was gunned down at the ranch in 1976, suspected of having an affair with the madam Sally.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117974040.html?categoryid=13&cs=1


Who his "Sally" was we can only guess. Wink, Wink.

It reminds me of the fact that in political circles hookers are always good news. At least they are not as rambunctious as “chubby interns.”

Hookers make for entertaining stories when powerful men are captiviated by the power of the cock and led into an imbroglio leaving everyone asking whose semen was put where when. Both Hillary and Silda, the soon-to-be former Mrs. Spitzer, proved themselves to be the penultimate handmaids of “irresponsible” and “child-like” husbands who the press can gleefully deride for being Democrats. Of course, Democrats launch shill at them too; you can even rate yourself at the Huffington Post to see how many diamonds you get at the Emperor’s Club….



At the same time, we are all reminded that to be a good handmaiden to the rich and horny, one must be like a good mother who can make “a village raise a child” and we are thankful to Silda for proving, "it takes a hooker to raise a husband."



But as a friend told me, “If you are a Democrat in politics, it is likely you are screwing around on your wife with a woman; if you are a Republican it is much more likely to be a man.” As Senator Larry Craig proved to the world after he held his “resignation.” So I think we should all take a moment to thank God it was a woman they found Client 9 with. It could have been much worse:

For the uninitiated out there, I will explain, the political classes of America eat up sex scandals faster than the Hollywood elite eat at Sushi Ikes. http://www.yelp.com/biz/sushi-ike-los-angeles

The truth, when it comes out, may be much deeper and funnier, though more profoundly damaging to both Spitzer and the manhandler Becky assumes Mrs. Spitzer to be.

If anyone can match Hillary for the envious title of “handmaiden of the century,” I would have to click my ruby slippers and pretend I was headed back to Kansas and if the people of New York could swallow the fictions Client 9 used to try to persuade them to adopt the REAL ID, and give drivers licenses to illegal aliens, it just goes to prove that everyone wants to swallow a little Spitzer.

Special note to public officials- as a libertarian, I do not care what you do with your genitals, or whose genitals you do what with, but please make sure not to use public funds to do so. Thanks- Brian

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...