Once again I can only stand in awe . . .

. . . of Becky's (the Girl in Short Shorts) ability to turn in not only the best line of the day but a an astounding--fact-based--analysis of why you may not want to feel quite so sorry for Elliot Spitzer's wife.

But first, the line:

Hillary, of course, always knew Bill was incapable of keeping his pants on. But I suspect Silda had her suspicions. The girl ain't dumb. And at least her hubby wasn't getting his rocks off on chubby interns.

The power of misplaced cum may propel Hillary Clinton into the White House.

It will take Silda Wall to anywhere she wants to go.

The entire post is entitled Silda Spitzer and the Power of Misplaced Cum.

You quite simply won't believe it.

Comments

Anonymous said…

"The girl ain't dumb. And at least her hubby wasn't getting his rocks off on chubby interns."

This aside from comments about metrosexuals may be the very best commentary I have ever seen on a "sexual debacle." I would prefer it if we were just mature enough to accept that powerful people want to get their rocks off as much as anyone else. Problem is one should not break the law to do so. I would have preferred to see an expose and comparison to Love Ranch.- Brian

March 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here: chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.” The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...

Search This Blog