Skip to main content

Newt Gingrich : Republicans Deserved to Be Fired

Gingrich lays out his view that this was "a performance election, not an ideological election". In short, the erstwhile Republican majority and the Bush administration dropped too many balls on too many fronts not to pay a high political price for 6-8 years of cumulative failures.

He suggests that while Barack Obama may establish a partisan majority for a while, there will be no left-centric ideological majority, especially now that Obama is establishing a centrist administration that is anything but representative of the more extreme left.

Gingrich cites how Obama ran and won an election on the promise of broad-based tax cuts - something Gingrich notes was once-dubbed 'right wing'.

Gingrich's general point highlights how the Obama tax-cut campaign fodder stands in stark contrast to the tax-cuts-are-the-big-bad-boogie-man screaches from the hardcore nanny government crowd, ever-so-loudly obfuscating their flat rejection of the heresy of making broad-based cuts in government spending.

Nevertheless, the point stands : Obama won running on "I will cut the taxes of millions of Americans". Not exactly liberal doctrine.

Gingrich also pretty much endorses Obama's neocon-ish/hawkish national security team. I would dare say Obama hardly ran on that.

My own sense is we will see Obama flip-flop on both the tax-cuts and his relatively-dovish campaign facade.

We will not see any real tax cuts for working people (much less rational spending cuts in government) and the neocon foreign policy will persist.

The worst of both worlds
. But I am sure Newt will be just as happy with neocon Obama, even if he isn't tax cutting neocon Obama.

[Note : the right-left paradigm is how Newt cast his analysis. I am personally trying as much as possible to avoid using this cheap short-hand in present-day contexts, though sometimes it is hard to avoid because so many on both ends of this imaginary "spectrum" themselves embrace it.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba