Skip to main content

We make money the old-fashioned way ... we print it

So aside from the Federal Reserve giving away essentially free money, latest reports suggest that President-elect Barack Obama's team is contemplating an $850 Billion to $1 Trillion stimulus package in 2009-2010.

Tax increases on the wealthy to pay for it? Off the table, aides say.

Add this onto the $8.5 Trillion of non-existent money we've already spent, it raises the question ...

Just how far is our government willing to drive us into debt in order to stave off the inevitable?

I keep thinking about economist Paul Krugman's idea that individual virtue can become public vice.

Depending upon whether you accept the nominal or adjusted figures for Gross Domestic Product, the dollar value of our GDP varies between $12-14 Trillion annually.

That means that we've already borrowed--just in the last few months--55-65% of our annual GDP, and we're getting ready to increase that significantly--even assuming that Barack Obama is the smartest man in world history and can pull off all his other promises without spending another extra dime.

If the United States were an individual, what would credit counselors be telling her? I know the drill; my family went through it about a year ago.

It's simple, really.

1) Stop borrowing money.

2) Become aware of what you're spending, and why.

3) Cut your spending until you can live within your means, making the life-style changes necessary to do that.

4) Begin a pay-down program for your debt.

If you can't do all of items 1-4, consider bankruptcy.

Ah, but individual virtue can be public vice. We must be Keynesians now, the Nobel Prize winner tells us.

Ironically, many of Paul Krugman's fans point out that his Nobel Prize in Economics represents a repudiation of the Nobel Prize received by Libertarian Milton Friedman back in the hey-day of the Goldwater Legacy and the Reagan Revolution. They miss the point that, economics being what it is, Krugman is unlikely to be the last word in system economics, and--from an historical perspective--is likely to find another economist recognized with a Nobel Prize in 20 years or so for refuting him.

But Krugman is the golden boy now, and deficits don't matter. Stimulus spending is what matters. Defer the pain caused by decades of bad decisions by doing the thing that makes so much sense that we'd never let an individual do it: borrowing more money.

Here's one difference between nations and individuals that Paul Krugman seems to have missed: individuals usually cannot pass their personal debts down to the next generation; nations routinely do so.

Eventually, somebody (probably my children or yours) is going to have to either pay or repudiate our debt.

Or we could do the adult thing right now: take the hit and clean up our own mess.

Not likely.

Unfortunately, Barack Obama promised YES, we can, and Change You Can Believe In long before he discovered the full extent of what eight years of profligate GOP spending and Democrat enabling had done to our financial system. By the time the first bail-out came up, then-Senator Obama had already portrayed himself as such a major change agent that he couldn't have backed down without jeopardizing the election.

But the situation he's inherited is one so different, so massively different from what he expected, that there are no ready answers in the liberal/progressive ideological/policy playbook. And he's so far in the back pocket of the defense industry that he can't touch the Defense budget or the interventionist foreign policy that his predecessors have inflicted on the nation and the world.

I would be open to something new and imaginative here, even if it came from a completely different ideological perspective than my own.

Yet all that President-elect Obama has thus far offered (or been offered by his advisors) is strong dose of what doesn't seem to have worked all that well in the 1930s.

Leaving me with only one question: how do I tell my thirteen-year-old twins that the government has just borrowed not only their college education funds, the mortgages for their first houses, the loans for their first cars, and their retirement accounts?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?