Skip to main content

When the reality of war catches up to the rhetoric of politics....

... it usually ain't pretty.

Make no mistake: our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan are the result of decisions made by Dubya's administration.

But it is now becoming equally clear that President-elect Barack Obama's campaign rhetoric about a withdrawal from Iraq, and about winning the war in Afghanistan will have fallen to the grim realities on the ground even before Inauguration Day.

Here's what senior Iraqi officials are now saying, that the US needs a military presence there for at least a decade:

Ali al-Dabbagh, spokesman for the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, said some U.S. forces could be needed for 10 years but told reporters that the terms of any extended presence would be negotiated between the next Iraqi and U.S. governments.

Washington and Baghdad recently negotiated a status of forces agreement, or SOFA, that calls for U.S. forces to leave Iraq's cities by mid-2009 and withdraw from the country by the end of 2011. The pact takes effect on Jan. 1, when the current U.N. mandate governing U.S. forces in Iraq expires.

"We do understand that the Iraqi military is not going to get built out in the three years. We do need many more years. It might be 10 years," Dabbagh said at a Pentagon press briefing.


As for Afghanistan, current and future Secretary of Defense Gates is on tour, and what he's saying is equally grim:

Standing outside the military's headquarters for southern Afghanistan, Gates was surrounded by evidence of the coming buildup. Everywhere he turned, swaths of land within the compound were crowded with construction equipment, and skeletons of partially erected buildings stood nearby.

"This is a long fight, and I think we're in it until we are successful along with the Afghan people," Gates said, adding: "I do believe there will be a requirement for sustained commitment here for some protracted period of time. How many years that is, and how many troops that is, I think nobody knows at this point."

McKiernan added that it will be at least three or four years before the Afghan troops can begin to build up the Afghan army and police enough so that they can operate more independently.


The logic of empire and the defense/industrial complex is ruthlessly simple: once you're in, you have to continue to throw good money (and American lives) after bad, because you convince yourself that you can't quit what you never should have started, or things will get worse.

All of which means that there will be no defense dividend during the first two years of an Obama administration, because you can't continue to occupy Iraq, fight a war in Afghanistan, maintain a deterrent posture in Asia, and rebuild the military while engaging in cuts to the defense budget.

I really was hoping for a statesman, but I think we got another politician.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
In three years it will be ten.
Zafo Jones said…
If you want to make an omelet you have to break some eggs. But what's an omelet but just a fried mess on a plate, prettied up with some cheese a sprig of parsley?

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba