Skip to main content

Brutality & The New Reality: Taxi to the Darkside

One thing is for sure, a reformation in the Islamic world is much better than the destruction of the Islamic world. This weekend watching from Carlata Gall and the BBC is enlightening about the way that brutality and reality meet to form a new set of rules in the American war on terrorism. It follows that my prediction of a ham handed response to a human problem is the cause of new forms of extremism for the "terrorism industry."


It shows less incoherence in the system then you would think at first, and it is not the work of a few bad apples, and it illustrates more systemic problems within our ability to effectively manage people we do not understand or who "some nameless 'we' do not care about" and are managed for us, to quote Adolous Huxley. The film is called the "Taxi to the Dark Side" and has won critical acclaim around the world. It is a sad contrast with my humorous posts and I am posting the whole thing here for your viewing with one question, "is American Idol still so entertaining?" Make sure you send this to all your friends.


Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--GCkdWlHdk


Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFCeNOfVduY


Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmsD_7uAS8w


Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXxJF_ixSaA


Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSwv6eF6QHo


Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiZuiGNHNuo


Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC__qW7FDAQ



The reality of this film has affected me profoundly and it reminds me of the 1664 persecution of Quakers; there are of course differences but they can be hard to discern during the fog of a total war strategy predicated on the idea that 9/11 changed everything, and must change us as human beings too. Such fear building techniques are less reminiscent of American political life and more reminiscent of the period just before the reign of Charles the II in Restoration England. I hope the restoration and reformation come quickly so that such deep sadness does not continue to occur here or abroad. I fear that what we win for "ourselves" by violence we will only be able to maintain with increased violence against ourselves and others.

I note with horror that in the film a taxi driver named Dilawar was killed by the Army and fear that Delaware could suffer the same fate because these details of the war of course have neither been explained to us or discussed with us as a people in an open democratic forum. It would be much better to do so to prepare the American people for changes and to explain the profound level of violence we are either willing to use or forced to use in the world.

Like others I of course will continue to advocate peace and non-extremism in all things, that includes from my own government, but the culture of "lawlessness" at one level of the executive branch has moved into other levels from the local DMV to the highest legislative offices of our state and I wish I our Governor, Senators and Congress people would work with the people to put an end to this type of arbitrary rule. Because while other states may not be good, or desire to be good, Delaware and Pennsylvania have William Penn sitting on our shoulder, and whose writings I will be publishing here soon, encouraging us to do so for the sake of all future generations.

We live in an imperfect, but it does not have to be brutal, world that is in deep need of a sense of the rule of law, the dignity of the human person and values of the enlightenment. Being tough on terrorism does not mean throwing away American values and principles- we can be better than good, we can be intelligent and good if we choose to be. This disturbing film is not for the squeamish. After you watch it you can all go back to your "American Idol" feel-goods.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Great post sir. FYI, you can watch Taxi To The Dark Side in its entirety online (for free).

Have a great day.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...