Skip to main content

Christianity and Homosexuality: Positive Movement in Delaware


OK, I'm about a week late on this one, but if I am brutally honest the Hockessin Community News often remains on my driveway for a couple of days before we rip it open and page through to get The Crownery Chinese Restaurant 10%-off coupon.

Sorry about that. Last week it caused me to nearly miss Andrea Miller's article Two local churches consider clarifying stance on homosexuality about the changes occurring at the Skyline and Newark United Methodist Churches:

Leaders at two local UMC churches, Skyline and Newark, feel it may be time to add explicit language to their Mission Statements to let people know that whatever an individual church member may think or feel, that yes, homosexuals are included in “all,” that “welcome” means they won’t be judged, lobbied or shunned by church policy or practice.

If Skyline and Newark did so, they would not be violating the UMC’s stance, as long as the churches do not ordain openly homosexual men and women (unless the candidate commits to a lifetime of celibacy), or perform commitment ceremonies for gay couples.

Inclusion advocates like Skyline Methodist Church’s Outreach Pathway Minister Judie Riley, recognize questions about the church’s stance on sexuality remain controversial, and know that coming to a consensus as a congregation can be easily hindered by misinformation, political agendas and fear of being ostracized by other churches. That is why both churches are engaged in a congregation-wide process that aims to clarify their positions through conversation, study and prayer.
[Emphasis added]


OK, it's interesting so far, even if it's only (technically) an elevated form of second-class citizenship--come in, you're welcome, we won't try to cure you, but you can't be ordained and you can't get committed (er. ah, married).

Let's read further:

Newark and Skyline are already known as progressive and open-minded churches. Both have baptized homosexual couples. Both allow openly gay men and women to serve communion, preach, teach and help to run the church. Both have connections to Reconciling Ministries Network (RMN) – a group devoted to bringing homosexuals into full church participation.

In fact, when Newark’s lay leader Paul Stazesky recently approached the congregation about starting an RMN Bible study, a lot of people were confused.

“Many said ‘I thought this is who we already are,’ and ‘I thought we were already doing this’,” Stazesky says. They wondered why it was necessary to add special language or special classes.

Riley says there’s a very important reason.

“We are talking about a marginalized population that hungers for God but is afraid to come to church because they have traditionally been shunned, excluded and singled out by the church,” she says. “They need a way to identify [as] us safe.”

It’s not unlike the first century Christians who faced persecution, she says. They signaled to each other by drawing the symbol of a fish. Today, gay and lesbian Christians look for RMN’s symbol of the rainbow.

It’s worked just that way at Newark: in just two months since their RMN study began, participation has more than tripled in size to 35 people.


I've seen a lot of Bible studies on homosexuality over the years, so you might excuse me for a healthy skepticism here. And it's evident that the world is not changing without angst:

At Skyline, not everyone has been comfortable with the church’s increasing inclusiveness. In the last two years, nine families have left Skyline because of it. That is not a mass exodus for a church of 250 regular parishioners, but Skyline co-pastor Bo Gordy- Stith says it surprised him, and highlighted the need for a congregation- wide conversation and Bible study.


Yet I still wonder exactly what they're teaching about homosexuality and the Bible:

Gordy-Stith says many straight people at Skyline may share her fear of upsetting the current calm: Skyline the center of debate and criticism among other churches if it adopts new inclusive language, particularly among those that believe the Bible’s condemns homosexuality and people who practice it should be corrected.

“This isn’t about throwing out the Bible. It’s about bringing an open mind and heart to the studying it,” Gordy-Stith says, because he does not believe the passages that seem to condemn it are translated accurately.

But even for Christians who believe today’s popular translations are accurate, to ignore their historical context would be like ignoring the impact of context on passages that condone genocide, slavery, patriarchy and polygamy, Stazesky says.


“The Bible calls for stoning drunkards to death. As a recovering alcoholic, I am relieved to know we recognize that is not appropriate today,” Stazesky says.

“Everyone has inherent value as a child of God. Social justice in the church can transform lives, but there is still discrimination and injustice in the church today,” he says. “I believe it is time to do the right thing.”


I have several thoughts about this, the first of which is admiration for a congregation willing to deal with the tough questions about what it means to be a Christian.

But I also wonder where it's going and what the ultimate barriers are. What happens when we reach the point where homosexuals are accepted at worship and then start asking for ordination and marriage? How far will toleration go then?


Historian John Boswell's Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europe collects hundreds of pages of evidence that the modern church's prejudice against homosexuality is actually an artifact of the Renaissance; indeed, Boswell argues, the ancient and medieval Christian churches not only canonized openly gay saints, but also had explicit ceremonies for solemnizing same-sex unions. I have to admit that Boswell's work remains controversial, and his conclusions are suggestive rather than definitive, but ...

... it raises important questions regarding the history and inclusiveness of Christianity that our society is desperately attempting to avoid.

My final thought: would that my own Catholic Church could display the moral courage of these two local Methodist congregations.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve, Try Habachi Japanese on Kirkwood Highway, it is much better, but is also run by Chinese people who make the best Japanese food I have ever had. Brian
Anonymous said…
Since I am already drunk this morning, maybe they meant "let the drunkards get stoned?"
I eat at the Hibachi about once a month--but they don't advertise in the Hockessin Community New
Brian said…
Steve, we finally got a comment from someone with a sense of humor. Let me ask, does being drunk on coffee count? Brian
Having been in the trenches in both the Presybterian and Methodist denominations, the unspoken but very real fear among straight people in a congregation that promotes its open and affirming views is that their church will become " a gay church." Gays will flock to it and take over. With the best intentions in the world, they don't mind having a few fags in the mix, but not a lot.

A happy exception to this commonplace is First Baptist Church in Seattle, an American Baptist congregation with a commitment to equality going back thirty years. Its membership is about half gay and half straight and life goes on pretty much as it should.
Anonymous said…
Outside of the Christian main, but very welcoming, is the UUFN.

http://www.uufn.org/

We don't just tolerate, we celebrate. And they even tolerate Christians!
apad 2 said…
Pretty effective piece of writing, thanks for the post.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...