Skip to main content

Naked and Raw Economic Debates On Delaware Liberal

Here are my naked, raw economic debates as filled with vulgarity as they are with optimistic pan Americanism for the future:

http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/02/29/big-hit-to-economy-from-credit-crunch-study-says/#comments

They are debates both with liberals and conservatives and many of the arguments come from my teachers like Steve Forbes, and other economists and financiers. Most importantly it shows an intellectual aggression that is unusual for me, but which was provoked by the current economic crisis, so many people's misunderstanding of its complexity and my understanding of its drivers. I almost regret studying John Nash, Buffett and with Forbes. Who are all in agreement that the Greenspan, Bernake crowd cannot create lasting prosperity for our nation or a pan-American group of nations. Ron Paul's idealism features in the discussion, but the important thing to take away is that Pan-Americanism does not have to be a violent event, it is a natural progression and we as all Americans should be a little more aggressive in our use of the Monroe Doctrine and the Doctrina Latina America to keep Europeans and Asians from eating the Americas like sushi.

In other words The United States need not be the English imperialists of the hemisphere, we can be something much better and more productive while increasing both production, development and investment at home and abroad. Now it is time for my all-American coffee so please excuse me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...