Skip to main content

Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) Lays Out America's Bankrupt(ing) Foreign Policy



Will Obama listen?

Will Congressional Democrats listen?

Will (self-styled) conservative Republicans listen?

Will any of DC's masters of our universe finally realize that our military imperialism is the most extravagant and destructive to our national lifeblood, of all federal excesses? (Given what a profitable racket it is for corporate and governmental interests, I think we know the answer to that).

Will our liberal friends ever write or speak out again about the lack of action in de-escalating and withdrawing from George W. Bush's middle-east adventures, now that their guy Obama is the responsible officer of government? Or is war now good for their "stimulus"?

If history and rhetoric are indicators, the answers to these questions are all a disheartening "NO!"

Funny, how the unabated occupation of Iraq, much less the proposed escalation in Afghanistan, is no longer on the lips of our (self-styled) liberal friends...given it was just about all we ever heard about from them for nearly 2 years.

Ohhh, that's right....as soon as Bush's lousy policies, ever so slightly tweaked, become Obama's brilliant policies, all is forgiven, no? Rather than note the 1000's of days of continued war, we get inanities, at least locally, like "Mike Castle's Betrayal of Delaware : Day XX". (Well, hardy-har-har!).

A Delaware Libertarian commenter once had an amusing observation. I'll paraphrase :

"On foreign policy, libertarians are liberals who remain anti-war when the Democrats are in power."

Former Air Force Colonel William Astore makes some excellent points in "An American Foreign Legion?", reprinted at tomdispatch.com. Steve wrote about it in the previous post to this, but it is worth repeating :

"Instead of collective patriotic sacrifice, however, it's clear that the military will now be running the equivalent of a poverty and recession "draft" to fill the "all-volunteer" military. Those without jobs or down on their luck in terrible times will have the singular honor of fighting our future wars...Caught in the shock and awe of 9/11, we allowed our military to be transformed into a neocon imperial police force."


Despite all this....one can still HOPE, right?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...