Skip to main content

Disaster Collectivism

I have used the term 'disaster socialism' or similar analogs, here and there, in recent writings, beginning with the first big government bailout schemes last fall.

I specifically used this term somewhat in mockery of breathless lefty idiot Naomi Klein's so-called 'disaster capitalism', a theory advanced in Klein's factually-challenged and intellectually-dishonest book : Shock Doctrine : The Rise of Disaster Capitalism.

[In "The Klein Doctrine : The Rise of Disaster Polemics", Cato's Jonah Norberg effectively demolishes Klein's near-libelous distortions and demonization of the late Milton Friedman who, obviously (and conveniently for Klein), is not around to defend himself. Fortunately others rose to the task.]

It is quite interesting less than two years after the debut of Klein's half-baked anti-capitalist diatribe that the American political left, now in power and doubtless cheered on by Klein, are pushing Klein's theories to new heights (or lows, depending on your perspective) by exploiting economic shock and turning it into epic crisis, whether real or perceived, to effect behemoth radical statism and central governmental expansionism.

David Boaz has penned a piece about "Obama's Shock Doctrine", making some salient observations about how Obama et al are acting right from the supposed disaster/opportunity playbook that Naomi Klein falsely attributes to evil rapacious free-marketeers of yore.

Boaz's observations aptly highlight what complete fabricated manure Ms. Klein peddles with her claims that economic and other crises have historically been exploited to advance pernicious capitalist ends rather than (the truth) as pretext for governments' seizing more and more control over their nations' economies.

I would say Klein evinces her total hypocrisy re: inherent evil in exploiting 'disaster' for ulterior agendas. But her beef apparently is not with the exploitative manipulation of crises and "shock", but rather that it has been done, according to her specious claims, to advance ideologies she abhors - like democratic capitalism and free enterprise economics.

So long as disaster exploitation advances the big lefty collectivist agenda Klein so worships...well....s'aaahright.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I just listened to Naomi Cline's talk on this weeks Alternative Radio ( available @ KUNM's two week archive or live Saturday Jan, 3, 2014). She used the phrase "Disaster Collectivism" as a response to Disaster Capitalism. I liked that phrase so much I looked it up on -line. All the reverences were to Ian Ran and than this article . What are you thinking? Libertarianism is not the rampant exploitation of humanity...it it? Please don't fear us. Disaster Collectivism is coming. Just look at what the Zapatistas have accomplished in Southern Mexico on this the 20 anniversary of NAFTA and their revolution.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...