Skip to main content

A history lesson for some of our friends...

... who seem to believe that no-holds barred political campaigning was invented during the reign of Bushco:

There was, of course, the infamous Coffin Handbill used by thoughtful proto-progressive John Quincy Adams against Andew Jackson in 1828:



Designed by Charles Hammond, who was not officially part of the Adams re-election campaign (call it plausible deniability), it was never disowned by the incumbent, and was in fact featured at his rallies, along with the oft-repeated charge that Andrew Jackson's wife was a mulatto prostitute.

Some of our readers might be old enough (and, I guess, lucky enough, given that it ran only once) to remember that infamous Daisy ad that LBJ ran against Barry Goldwater, intimating that the GOP candidate had a hankering to start a thermonuclear war:



Naturally, some bruising political ads are intramural rather than inter-party:



Of course there's also this little number:



I realize that some of our readers (hello, A1) would be quite all right with playing the moral equivalence game that puts Dubya on the same scale with the man who not only committed genocide, but started a war that killed over 125 million people in six years....

... and that partly explains this pseudo-historical treatment by a wannabe scholar who is actually nothing more than a political propagandist:



In the grand scheme of things, Wanda Sykes, David Feherty, Rush Limbaugh, and even Al Frankenare symptoms rather than causes.

Symptoms of what? A healthy if often unlovely democracy that persists in spite of supposedly high-minded attempts to censor it.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve,
It greives me to see you write such a word, you more than most, knowing full well that we do not live in a democracy, you who fight so well for the minority. You and I disagree on many things, and you make me question my libertarian beleiefs, in that I may not be libertarian enough. Discourse is a great institution in our society, but I for one loath the thought of a true democracy, as did those who drafted that document that replaced the Articles.

Marsh Fox
Marsh,
Remember this, please: when you write literally thousands of words per day (as I do here and in my job), it often strains reality to put that much stress on any one--I could have said "democratic process"--but I didn't...

Oh well
G Rex said…
Ma, ma, where's my pa?
Gone to the White House, ha ha ha!
Delaware Watch said…
"I realize that some of our readers (hello, A1) would be quite all right with playing the moral equivalence game that puts Dubya on the same scale with the man who not only committed genocide, but started a war that killed over 125 million people in six years...."

Moral equivalence has a numerical value? Since when?
Moral equivalence has a numerical value? Since when?Moral equivalence, I think, definitely does have a scale value. Plotting the intentional destruction of entire races of people is different from starting a limited war.

Is there an exact number (Bush would have equaled Hitler if Hitler had only killed 300,000 Jews?)? Absolutely not. But all it tells me if someone can equate Bush with Hitler or the GOP with the Nazis is that they do not have a very firm grasp on the history of the world between 1933-1945.
Anonymous said…
Steve,
I stand corrected, you are quite right, however, it also occured to me that quite a few of your fellow bloggers on the left and right would do well to read history in raw form. I seem to remember that Lincoln's campaigns were fairly ugly too, and I would have to agree that the ugliness that persued Jackson sent his poor wife to the grave. Mass media just makes this whole damn sham of a representative government seem meaner uglier these days. Oh, those guys on the left, guess they don't have a problem with what Sherman did huh? Oh, wait, the victors write the history don't they?
Marsh Fox

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?