Skip to main content

Neither surprise nor sympathy at credit card changes...

Yeah, who'da thunk it?

Faced with imminent new regulations controlling their interest rates and pretty despicable practices, credit card companies are jacking in every single dollar they can prior to the new regs going into force:

It appears that credit card issuers are insisting upon exercising their right to abuse their customers in the name of higher profits. A survey of recent activities by the top eight credit card issuers reveals that since the Federal Reserve announced rule changes designed to curb unfair credit card industry practices last December, the companies have implemented even more onerous practices, raised interest rates more aggressively and increased the number of fees that they can impose on their customers.

The Center For Responsible Lending (CRL) released its findings on Monday and according to the report, Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC), J.P. Morgan Chase (JPM), Capital One (COF), HSBC (HBC), Discover (DFS), American Express (AXP) and Well Fargo (WFC) have each increased interest rates on existing balances for many of their account holders on an "any time, any reason" basis within the last six months. This practice will be illegal under the new Fed rules which take affect in July 2010. The CRL estimates that at least 10 million card holders have been affected, and some have seen increases of 10 percentage points or more on their existing rate at a time when many consumers are having trouble staying afloat.

"This shows that they are trying to get as much money as possible before the rules change," said Kathleen Day, a spokesperson for the center....

The CRL report highlighted several changes that top credit card issuers have made that are adversely affecting consumers. Perhaps the most onerous practice was put in place by American Express, which Day said has started charging some cardholders three percent of their balance as a late penalty instead of a fixed fee. With this change, a consumer with a balance of $5,000 would be subject to a $150 late charge instead of the $39 most companies impose. "Going to a percentage of available balance is pretty steep," said Day.


OK: are you really surprised?

Here's the thing: I have only limited sympathy for the people caught in this trap, because many--although by no means all--have had ample warning and plenty of opportunities to get the hell out of this situation for the past two years.

You had to swallow some pride, cut up the cards, sign up with a credit counseling agency, and re-orient your life to live within your means.

Let me be clear: I am not talking about people is special situations where there was no other option, and there are such people.

But there are millions of Americans out there who, even after the Great Meltdown hit last fall have continued to use the plastic to live beyond their means, and somewhere along the line the State is going to expect you and me to help pay for it.

So the news for today is... banks are avaricious and millions of Americans want a free ride.

Nothing to see here. Move along.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
Credit card orders used to be about 5-15% of all pizza orders when I started three years ago.

Now it is close to 25-40% depending on the day.

I cashed out a delivery driver the other day who had 8 credit deliveries and 3 cash for the day.

Yeah, people have not learned their lesson.

I would say part of the reason for the increase is the "trading down" effect. Families that used to go out are now ordering in. They are more apt to use revolving credit as a budget buffer.

My wife and I are still on track to be credit card debt, personal loan debt, and car loan free by January 2010. The payment snowball is in effect and will soon be clearing out those cards. We will, effectively, knock out 1,000/month off of our monthly debt totals by January if all goes according to plan.

Both while working part time in low wage jobs while putting ourselves through college (Albiet hers is on student loans. Those we will tackle after the other debt is gone.)

It can be done, people.
I was caught in the credit card trap due to a combination of both health issues and just plain stupidity. I made a plan to get out of it.

It took me three years. I now carry a zero balance on the one card that I kept.

Yes, it can be done. It isn't easy, but it is doable.

And, since my 401-K has lost 40% of its value in the past year, I am now putting any disposable income into cold, hard cash.
Hube said…
My wife just opened our latest statement and was outraged that they interest rate had been jacked up to over 15%. We rarely carry a balance (in this case we recently purchased plane tix for a summer trip), so the effect as a whole is minimal, but she was really miffed. What's more, when she called to see what happened, the customer service was rude and obnoxious. When wife said "they shouldn't be allowed to do this," I told her that they won't -- soon. That's why they're doing it NOW.
Brian Shields said…
If you play with snakes, you are gonna get bit.
Nancy Willing said…
I got into a mess years back, mostly over not having read fine print and the unexpected trapped me but good.

The all-but-hidden escalators that are arbitrary and exist to entrap should be controlled.

I had a limit that did not surpass but surprise, surprise, who knew that if you got within your limit your risk level rises...WTF?

Also I was stupid about using the Discover Checks and the cash advances....oh, do those balances really exist in a SEPARATE RATE? huh. Before you know it I was in real trouble. I got out and haven't had a card in six years now.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba