Skip to main content

Brian Tierney on bankers these days

I like the Michael Smerconish Show, and frankly suspect anybody who doesn't.

This morning he interviewed Brian Tierney, the managing partner of the Philadelphia Inquirer and Daily News (who put up $10m of his own money to keep the papers local).

The interview, which you can hear as a podcast here, is interesting for a number of reasons.

The most interesting is when Tierney talks about banks. The Daily News saw profits drop from $51m to $36m last year, but still turned a profit. The corporation filed for Chapter 11 to restructure its debt. Tierney discusses the representatives from Citigroup and other banks riding down to Philly in their limos to make demands and give him advise that he has to take because they are covenanted creditors, for whose consultations he must pay $300k per month.

Tierney points out the incredible irony of bankers who are on the public dole, and whose stocks have tanked by 90-96% of last year's value coming in to give business advice to a set of newspapers that's still turning a profit.

Worth a listen.

Smerconish, by the way, is not a typical conservative talking head. I frequently disagree with him, especially on foreign policy, but unlike the shouters he's literate, respectful of guests and callers, and actually has points of view that are his own.

Plus, he's funny.

Comments

Smerconish is the sort of conservative you see too little of. Here in Stromland the leading right wing aggregator is busy purging bloggers not conservative enough- all three bright, thoughtful, but independent minds.
Anonymous said…
I like Mike. Biggest downside? he voted for Obama!
Anonymous said…
I also like Smerconish, as frequently seen as a panalist on various MSNBC evening shows. I agree with your commentary on him, Steve.

The fact that he voted for Obama is an upside, in my view.

Mike is a conservative, but an independent thinker as well. I put Steve in the same category.

Perry Hood
Perry
I'll accept that as an intended compliment, but I am not in any way, shape, or form a conservative.

Again, I draw your attention to the title of this blog.

How do you get to be considered a conservative if you are pro-gay rights, pro-abortion rights, anti-US imperialist interventionist foreign policy?
Anonymous said…
Point taken, Steve. And yes, it was meant to be a compliment, though an off-base one as it turns out.
Anonymous said…
Tierney took $300-$400 million in loans from these guys. If they insist he must at least listen to their advice, that hardly seems unfair. If he did not want to have banks looking over his shoulder, he should have found the several hundred million he needed elsewhere (and he had a fat chance of doing that.) Plus, I find it absurd that he keeps saying he makes a profit - he only can say that when he omits one very major expense he signed up for - the interest payments. All he does is spin. Surprised he has not gotten dizzy yet. I have no sympathy. None.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?