If Delaware became like Idaho...

... as much as I hate to admit it, we'd have closed the largest part of our State budget deficit.

Kilroy (damn his hide) got me thinking about this, with his proposal that a State sales tax be used to fund education.

I agree with the commenter that it would take one hell of a lot more balls than anybody in the General Assembly has to even propose such a consumption tax.

Besides, we'd have to repaint that Home of Tax-free Shopping sign.

But, for kicks and grins, I asked myself what would happen if the State just raised the Gross Receipts Tax, which is functionally a hidden sales tax.

If you have to have taxes at all, I like consumption taxes, because (a) I can choose not to consume; and (b) if we're going to take money from people at gunpoint, it might as well include all those tourists at the Beach who won't leave me a parking space.

But it turns out to be quite a lot of fun to discover what kind of revenue the State is actually collecting from the GRT (which is currently topped out just below 2%).

According to the Tax Foundation, Delaware ranks 49th out of 50 in sales/GRT tax receipts. Per capita, Delaware collects on $520 annually.

Should Delaware essentially double the GRT, bringing it up to 43rd in the nation (right around Idaho), my back of the matchbook calculation suggests it would bring in something on the order of $400 million in new revenue.

Probably half that money would be collected around Dover Downs on race weekends or outside Gus N Gus Hamburgers on the boardwalk, from people who don't live here.

Now I'd reduce that income forecast by 25% just to allow for the Recession itself and a negative impact on business revenues.

But the question of the day is: how much less a disaster would a $300 million shortfall be than a $600 million shortfall?

Besides, we could still keep lying to the tourists and telling them we have no sales tax.

Comments

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here: chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.” The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici...

Search This Blog