Skip to main content

The modern world: when the coolest new discovery scares the hell out of me...

This from Science Daily:

ScienceDaily (Feb. 11, 2009) — Researchers at Canada's largest children's rehabilitation hospital have developed a technique that uses infrared light brain imaging to decode preference – with the goal of ultimately opening the world of choice to children who can't speak or move.

In a study published this month in The Journal of Neural Engineering, Bloorview scientists demonstrate the ability to decode a person's preference for one of two drinks with 80 per cent accuracy by measuring the intensity of near-infrared light absorbed in brain tissue.

"This is the first system that decodes preference naturally from spontaneous thoughts," says Sheena Luu, the University of Toronto PhD student in biomedical engineering who led the study under the supervision of Tom Chau, Canada Research Chair in pediatric rehab engineering.


I want this for brain-damaged children. I want this for paralyzed people. I want this to work out in the worst way.

But why is it that all I can think about when I think about this new technology is what some government agent (whether from our government or somewhere else) could do with it at Girmo (or any hellhole in the world)?

This is the world we live in ... wherein you have to think, almost instantly, of the evil we could do with new inventions rather than the good.

Maybe it's just me. I really hope so.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve-You have every right to be scared. I have watched over the last 4 decades well-intentioned assistive devices/interventions morph into extreme overusage, and misapplied modality of service to our citizens. Most of these have to do with end of life issues. A partial list includes: the ventilator--originally designed to resuscitate young drowning victims--the acknowledgement that a young, viable person can be rescued and returned to a full, productive life. Organ transplants--again, for the acute episode of organ failure in young/mid adulthood, with the relative assurance of return to full, productive engagement. There was a time when a patient wasn't admitted to an intensive care unit after age 65. I am by no means saying the current threshold be 65, but ask any health care provider, the hospitals are turning into nursing homes, and the nursing homes are turning into hospitals and rehab centers. We as a nation really need to examine chemo being started on 90 year olds, who are already bedridden and confined, and organs being allocated to 75+, as a repeat procedure. Tough outcomes, expensive financially and resourcefully for some well intended purposes. Almost forgot my favorite, cryogenics. Woman had husband's sperm banked when he became ill. He subsequently died. A time later decides to go forth and induce pregnancy, post his demise. She wants and is suing for Social Security for the child. And then there's our Constitution, and Bill of Rights. Yea, it's scary.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?