Skip to main content

WSFS, Wilmington Trust, and Bancorp receive TARP funds

[h/t Liz Allen]

Go here for a raw list of every bank that has thus far received TARP funds. It's not alphabetized, and it doesn't give you any idea how much each bank received. UPDATE--later I found the list below with amounts.

It makes fascinating reading.

You'd think there would be somebody in the State aware of this, or maybe even--I don't know--a newspaper that would publish the fact that Wilmington Trust, WSFS, and Bancorp were taking the money.

The 31 January WNJ story documented the horrible condition of Wilmington Trust's accounts, but said nothing about the application for TARP funds, even though the bank applied for them on 12 December.

WSFS received $53 million, prior to 23 January. Did I miss the story?

From other sources I discover that The Bancorp received $45 million and Wilmington Trust got $330 million.

So that's $428 million to Delaware banks out of the $700 billion.

So far....

Comments

Brian Shields said…
What's funny is that a while back in the midst of banks dropping like dominos, I was worried about my accounts with Wilmington Trust. The bank had a 3 out of 5 star stability rating.

So.. if it wasn't really that troubled, then why was it approved for funding?
Anonymous said…
Everyone likes free money !!!
Brian Miller said…
Most bank ratings are bunk due to "off balance sheet assets."

If your bank is "strong and well capitalized" according to its balance sheet, but has negative equity "off balance sheet" in sour derivatives trades, did it really earn that "five star" rating?

That's the problem with the entire financial system -- it's completely opaque. The books, accounting, ratings, and earnings reports are all completely without basis.
Brian Shields said…
Well, apparently WT isn't hurting. Even though it is Friday, and it is their busiest day, when i stopped in today they had all of their offices full, all of their teller lines open with the drive through fully staffed....

.. and they had a spare teller standing in the lobby to help direct people.

Like noone knows where to sit waiting for accounts, or where the line to deposit your check is.

Extra staff in lean bank times? Sure seems like WT really needed that TARP money.
Wow, there is really much useful data here!

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...