Skip to main content

Prominent Michigan Libertarian provides alternatives to gigantic government spending to address economy

I particularly like this piece from the Port Huron (MI) Times Herald by City Councilman and local Libertarian chair Mark Byrne not so much because I agree with every jot and tittle, but because he demonstrates that there are different strategies available to deal with the Great Meltdown.

Moreover, he also demonstrates that many Libertarians are thinking analytically about economic issues and realistic questions of taxation, rather than being slavishly limited in their viewpoints by ideological blinders:

Libertarians predicted the housing bubble bursting and the mortgage crisis. We advocated preventing this by these proposals:


Stop letting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac make more loans to less-credit-worthy customers each year.


Stop artificially making money cheap to borrow with low federal rates that encouraged borrowing for risky investments.

A 21st-century tax system is needed now. We must switch from income, payroll and property taxes paid by the products produced here to a tax that taxes all products made anywhere the same. This immediately makes our products less costly and foreign products more expensive, a reverse of our current tax system.

Whatever size government we choose, the tax system should not work against us. Our current taxes add 40% to the cost of products and only 6% to foreign products in Michigan. We need a system that taxes both imported and domestically produced products the same, so we don't put our products at a disadvantage.

A 30% sales tax with no other taxes would decrease the cost of producing a product by 40%. A car costing $16,000 to make would cost only $9,600 when sold here at $12,480. Foreign cars now selling for $10,000 would sell for $13,000. Overnight, we are competitive again.

To jump-start the economy from this mess, the $2 trillion in bailouts and stimulus packages could have been used to keep funding the government during a three-month tax vacation.

This would allow a transition from our current tax system that taxes the production of goods to a 21st-century tax system that taxes the consumption of goods with a sale tax. People would start getting their entire pay checks and want to spend them before the 30% sales tax kicks in.


That last paragraph really represents the kind of innovative thinking that is, unfortunately, conspicuous by its absence in much of the current economic debate on the part of either the administration's supporters or detractors.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve,
I realize you said you don't agree with everything he said, but if you agree with the priciple he is putting forth then basically you advocate the Fair Tax. Just saying, to the best of my poor Southern Delaware minds way of thinking. Yours Truly,

Marsh Fox

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...