Skip to main content

Things are true because words mean what I say they do

Overseas contingency operations will replace the war on terror.

We will no longer use the term enemy combatants even though we will still engage in extraordinary rendition and we assert the power to hold people pretty much forever without charges.

President Obama will keep his promise to withdraw all combat brigades from Iraq by renaming them:

Despite President Barack Obama's statement at Camp LeJeune, North Carolina Feb. 27 that he had "chosen a timeline that will remove our combat brigades over the next 18 months," a number of Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs), which have been the basic U.S. Army combat unit in Iraq for six years, will remain in Iraq after that date under a new non-combat label.

A spokesman for Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Lt. Col. Patrick S. Ryder, told IPS Tuesday that "several advisory and assistance brigades" would be part of a U.S. command in Iraq that will be "re-designated" as a "transition force headquarters" after August 2010.

But the "advisory and assistance brigades" to remain in Iraq after that date will in fact be the same as BCTs, except for the addition of a few dozen officers who would carry out the advice and assistance missions, according to military officials involved in the planning process.

Gates has hinted that the withdrawal of combat brigades will be accomplished through an administrative sleight of hand rather than by actually withdrawing all the combat brigade teams. Appearing on Meet the Press Mar. 1, Gates said the "transition force" would have "a very different kind of mission," and that the units remaining in Iraq "will be characterized differently."

"They will be called advisory and assistance brigades," said Gates. "They won't be called combat brigades."

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve, you are certainly cherry-picking here. Look again at Gates' statement just before the part that you emboldened: "Gates said the "transition force" would have "a very different kind of mission," and that the units remaining in Iraq "will be characterized differently.""

A "different kind of mission", says Gates, Steve. Apparently you don't believe him, correct? Why not?

Perry Hood
When I went back to finish my degree in the late 80's, early 90's, I was called a "non-traditionally aged student".

LOL. They should have just said "old broad".
Anonymous said…
Shirley, that's a good one!

And good for you! I'll bet you had a few things to teach those younguns, students and professors alike!!

Perry Hood
Anonymous said…
Perry: Is there ANYTHING people say about Obama for which you won't defend him?

I'm sure you thought it was "cherry picking" when people laughed at Reagan's "enhanced radiation weapon" (aka the neutron bomb) and "revenue enhancements" (aka tax increases). This is the precisely the same thing.

Duh.
Perry,

The kind of mission doesn't matter.

Candidate and President Obama both promised the withdrawal of "combat troops."

In case you don't understand the different, combat brigades are collections of Infantry, armor, and artillery units.

Combat support troops are logistical units.

What Obama and Gates are doing is the equivalent of taking a .44 magnum handgun, sticking a paper label on it that says "Peacemaker," and then telling people they've taken guns off the streets.

I really try to be nicer than Hube, but either (a) you just don't get it; (b) you are the complete Obama apologist; or (c) you are one of my libertarian friends posting as Perry Hood to see how long it will take me to determine you're not really serious.

Which is it?
Anonymous said…
Steve, I take Gates at his word, unless demonstrated otherwise. Let us assume that the units remaining contain the three unit types you listed. Do we then assume a mission for them to be other than what Gates said? It could well be that they will be in training mode for the Iraqi military. It could mean that they will be used for protection purposes instead of for combat missions. Neither you nor have any evidence to the contrary. Your view is based mainly on speculation. That said, you could be correct.

On your other point, I have admired and trusted Obama since he announced his intentions and I read his two books. Yes, politically we are on the same page on most issues. Moreover, I trust him, much as you probably trust Ron Paul, or someone who represents your political/ideological preferences/agenda very well.

So far, I think Obama is doing a very good job under extremely trying circumstances, in spite of the critics like Hube, Limbaugh, Beck, Coulter, Hannity, BillO, and the like, who do all they can on a daily basis to bring him down.

Perry Hood

PS: I'm sorry to be missing your get together tonight.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...