Skip to main content

Meet Paul Ryan

Not real sure what the finger thing is, either.

Comments

Eric Dondero said…
Many Libertarians would have voted in favor of the Patriot Act. If you oppose the Patriot Act you essentially endorse a weak approach to fighting Islamic terrorism.

3,000 of our fellow Americans died on 9/11, including a number of Delawareans. It's sad, very, very sad, that some Libertarians don't see that as a big deal.

(Agree his marijuana vote sucks!)
Yep, the appropriate response to being bombed by foreigners on 9/11 who snuck into the country was to take away civil rights from millions of American citizens who never did anything wrong.

Got it.
Eric Dondero said…
Was it taking away civil rights for Americans or Muslims?

If we are bound by political correctness, and cannot even bring ourselves to identify our enemies, we are doomed.

I'm sorry, but giving a Saudi student overstaying their Visa the right to look up plans for dirty bombs, on TAXPAYER SUBSIDIZED computers at the local library in Newark, or Bear, or Claymont, or Smyrna does not fit the definition of "libertarian" to me.
Eric Dondero said…
What exactly would be an appropriate response to the killings of 3,000 of our fellow countrymen Steve?

Do you honestly think dropping a few bombs on Afghanistan would be enough?

I'm half Italian dude. We I-talians have an old saying: You fucka wid my family, we come to your village and kill your entire family, then we burn down your village, and just for shits and giggles, we may even burn down the entire country-side surrounding your village.

Simply put: You fuck with the United States of America, we will blow your little shitole of a country into kingdom come. THAT'S LIBERTARIAN.
Eric Dondero said…
I gotta ask the left-libertarians, is there ANYTHING? you all would have done, anything at all, after 9/11 to counter the Islamists here in the United States? Would you all left-libertarians just left them alone, completely. Just go about your business Mr. Muslim. No problem that your fellow Muslims killed 3,000 Americans. We don't care. Just keep doing it to us Mr. Muslim. Cause you know we Americans are such patsys.

My gosh, talk about Girlie-manization of America. Limp-writers and white flag wavers unite.
Eric Dondero said…
I would remind you left-libertarians, Major Nidal Hassan was a DIRECT RESULT!!! of y'all's limp-wristed policies towards Islamists.

Because we were so goddamned PC, the military didn't go after Hassan. They were too scardy-cat to do anything for fear they'd be called "racists."

This despite the fact that Hassan repeatedly threatened his non-Muslim collegues in the Army.

Result of Political Correctness on Hassan: 13 American soldiders shot dead, another 30 seriously wounded.

Thanks left-libertarians. Thanks leftist girly-man-ners. Keep promoting PC wimpy-ass policies on Islamism, and we'll have even more Americans dead.
tom said…
OK Eric. We get it. You're a "libertarian" warmonger who loves the Patriot Act more than the Bill of Rights.

But you still haven't stated which sections of the Patriot Act are really good from a libertarian perspective.
Eric Dondero said…
And you're a so-called libertarian who loves Sharia Law more than the US Constitution.

We pro-defense libertarians call that girlie-manism. "Oh, Mr. Muslim we're so sorry we've got troops on your land. Please don't be mad at us. Let me bend over and you can fuck me up the ass. Would that make you feel better? Please don't kill us Mr. Muslim."
Eric Dondero said…
Hey Tom, tell ya what, you tell me what parts of Sharia Law are consistent with libertarianism and I'll answer your question about the Patriot Act.

Is it the ban on alcohol?

How 'bout the part where the Muslims hang gay guys from the nearest lamppost?

Or, maybe it's the part where they force our pretty wives/girlfriends to wear ugly black burkas from head to toe.

Really, where in Sharia Law consistent with libertarian values? C'mon Tom. Don't be a pussy boy. Fess up. You say you don't want to fight back against the Islamo-Nazis. You're all anxious to surrender to them. Fine. Tell me how it is we'll have a libertarian society living under Islam?
tom said…
Ad hominem attacks & Straw Men won't work Eric. You said "The Patriot Act is a mixed bag; half is really good, the other is bad from a libertarian perspective."

If you want to continue this pathetic attempt to evade the issue, cite something I ever said in favor of Sharia Law. Don't just make shit up.

Otherwise, answer the question: which sections of the Patriot Act do you think are really good from a libertarian perspective?

Skip the rhetoric. Just cite about half of the 9 sections of U.S. Code it added and/or the 108 sections of U.S. Code it amended.
delacrat said…
Eric,

After seeing your copious use of:

"patsys", "Girlie-man", "Limp-writers", "white flag wavers", "limp-wristed", "scardy-cat", "Political Correct", "left-libertarians"," leftist girly-man-ners","wimpy-ass"

I would suggest you might want to wait until you've passed the 3rd grade elementary school before posting again.

Cordially yours,

delacrat
anonone said…
Eric Dondero = James Holmes wannabe

In other words, a murderous asshole who support mass indiscriminate killing of innocent people.
Eric Dondero said…
Hey "delacrat" ever served in the Military? I did. 4 years. Joined right here in Delaware.

I'd thank you to thank me for my military service chicken shit.
anonone said…
Hey Eric, why don't you thank Wade Michael Page for his service, because you're both cut from the same cloth of murderous assholes.
tom said…
Hey Eric,

Still waiting for your answer: which sections of the Patriot Act do you think are really good from a libertarian perspective?

or better yet, just man up and admit that you made an outrageous and indefensible statement.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...