Skip to main content

Libertarian ideas busting out all over

Despite both national and local attempts to demonize Libertarians, it is apparent that Libertarian (as opposed to Conservative) ideas are breaking through into mainstream society and politics as never before.

Some examples:

1.  After decades of technical stagnation, overspending, disasters, and a massive failure of vision that has allowed countries like China and India to challenge America in space exploration, the US is finally relaxing the NASA stranglehold on manned spaceflight and allowing private industry in the door.  The new contracts for the "space taxi" build on the successful space station re-supply trip recently conducted by a privately built vehicle.

2.  Sacramento airport is joining a growing list of airports that are taking advantage of the opportunity to dump the TSA.

3. Local liberal bloggers admit, "The War on Drugs has been a massive failure that our politicians can’t seem to admit, for fear of looking weak on crime."  Now, when reaching this kind of epiphany, one would expect some move to look for political candidates with the courage to say publicly what they admit privately, or--in simple terms--to lead rather than pander.  In Delaware, however, as in the national presidential race, only Libertarian candidates are actually doing that.


This deserves a note:  although those more interested in ideological purity than functional politics throw hissy fits when this happens, Kilroy's Delaware provides a perfect example of how to handle the situation:  Kilroy endorsed Libertarian US House candidate Scott Gesty's position on education rather than endorsing his candidacy.  How about it, LG?  Candidates like Scott Gesty, Margaret Melson, and Ronnie Fitzgerald have signed the pledge to end the drug wars, and are campaigning publicly on that stand.  How about a statement from you endorsing their position if not their candidacy?  If nothing else it will put pressure on weak-kneed Democratic candidates to take a real position.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...