Skip to main content

Sometimes you wonder why we thought it would work in the first place . . . ..

. . . . and then other times you're sure we were positively ape-shit out of our minds.

Everyone--even our most strident Iraq war critics--agrees that we should have invaded Afghanistan, and that we should be focusing our efforts there, even as we get the hell out of Baghdad.

Just one example from Senator Barack Obama, the man who would not have supported the invasion of Iraq at all:

One of the things that I think is critical, as the next president, is to make absolutely certain that we not only phase out the Iraq but we also focus on the critical battle that we have in Afghanistan and root out al Qaeda. If we do not do that, then we're going to potentially see another attack here in the US. [June 2007 debate]


So we overthrew the Taliban, we're rooting around in the hills like a fat man trying to locate his wallet, and we've engaged in serious nation-building activities in support of moderate President Harmid Karzai.

Now we're trying to figure out a way to pass the ball to NATO.

So here's Al Jazeera today:

Thousands of Afghans have taken part in a second day of protests against the reprinting of a cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad in Danish newspapers and a Dutch film that reportedly criticises the Quran.

Demonstrators in the eastern city of Jalalabad burned flags and demanded that the cartoonist and the politician making the film be punished.

"We want the government of Denmark and Holland to arrest and bring to justice all those who are insulting Islam," one of the organisers of Sunday's protest said.

The protest came a day after about 5,000 people marched in the western city of Herat, chanting "Death to Holland, death to Denmark".

On Tuesday, in the capital Kabul, about 200 politicians shouted "Death to the enemies of Islam" outside the country's parliament.

Some protesters in Jalalabad called on the Kabul government to sever ties with Denmark and the Netherlands, while others demanded troops from the two countries leave Afghanistan.

"We don't want Dutch and Danish forces in Afghanistan. If our government does not kick them out, we will continue our demonstrations until they leave Afghanistan," Qari Ibrahim, a university student, said.

"If these forces do not leave, we are prepared to carry out suicide attacks against them."

The Netherlands has about 1,500 troops deployed in Afghanistan as part of a Nato-led mission, while Denmark has more than 600 personnel.


OK, so I understand why we went in, toppled the Taliban, and took a quick shot at decapitating Al Qaeda.

What I don't understand is why we're still there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...