Where should Ron Paul supporters go this November?

That's a question that Jim Fryar, the Real World Libertarian, has been contemplating that question for some time.

Contrary to the loudly voiced opinions of many Paul supporters (and many Libertarians) calling for Dr. No to run either as an independent or as a Libertarian, Jim makes a persuasive case that Paul supporters should now support Senator John McCain.

Definitely worth reading.

I'm not sure if I agree with his choice of arguments, but maybe I'm not the best person to judge, since I wasn't a strong Ron Paul supporter in the first place.

Comments

Brian Shields said…

I think we should do a huge write in campaign. Like Vote "None Of The Above" in that Richard Prior movie. Instead, though, we write in something symbolic... like "Change" or "America" or "Freedom."

March 13, 2008 at 7:39 AM

Anonymous said…

Have you actually read the post you linked to? There is nothing "persuasive" about Jim Fryar's case for John McCain! If you read his pathetic arguments, which he ripped from a satirical blog, you can effortlessly debunk them!

Mr. Delaware Libertarian, please understand that Jim Fryar is a hack! A libertarian-in-name-only and a neocon-in-libertarian-clothing.

It is most unfortunate that Ron Paul lost the GOP nomination. You claim never to have been a Ron Paul supporter (though not at all anti-Paul), so that might explain your perspective, but a libertarian would NEVER vote for the fascist the neocons nominated for the Republican presidential ticket.

Assuming that your moniker is genuine and not ironic, as a libertarian you ought to vote for your party. I am in favor of writing in Ron Paul, but you can always sit this one out. Personally, I figure Obama is the lesser of three evils. I would prefer he win because I would hate to see that smirking asshole McCain smirk all the way to the White House after he snatched the nomination.

May 16, 2008 at 1:14 PM

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

Search This Blog