Skip to main content

The problem with polling for Libertarian candidates

Civitas has recently released its latest poll on the North Carolina governor's race, which shows Libertarian candidate Michael Munger at only 2%, not the 4-6% he's been garnering in the polls at Public Policy Polling.

The problem is one of high variability when you're polling below 8-10%.

The Civitas poll included 598 likely voters, of which only twelve expressed a preference for Munger. A total of 86 voters expressed no opinion. Sampling becomes problematic--hence the perennial qualifier of margin for error--at the 5% and below range. Had three more voters expressed a preference for Munger, he would have been rounded up to 3%. You have to wonder about the reliability and validity of such polls for third-party candidates.

However, there are two particularly interesting items in the Civitas poll: (1) the poll confirms that Munger enjoys stronger support among African-American men than might generally be expected from a Libertarian candidate; and (2) the poll shows Munger pulling 2% of Democrats and 6% of unaffiliated voters--but no Republicans.

Clearly the idea that the Libertarians in North Carolina are going to act as some sort of GOP spoiler needs to be examined more closely.

This is also the case in the new Survey USA 30 June Poll that gives Munger 4% statewide. This poll suggests that Munger voters are three times more likely to favor Barack Obama than John McCain for the Presidency. [Granted, this answer could also have been biased by the lack of an option to pick LP candidate Bob Barr.]

Survey USA also reports that Munger draws equally from Dem and GOPer voters (but twice as many independents). What's new here is that Munger voters are twice as likely to be pro-abortion rights as not, and spread themselves evenly over the spectrum of liberal-moderate-conservative.

Curiouser and curiouser....

Comments

It's based on nothing other than having lived there a long time, but I doubt there are many Republicans in North Carolina who would give serious thought to voting Libertarian. They tend to be business conservatives and ex-Democrats who crossed the aisle over race in the '70s.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici...