Skip to main content

The Tuwiaitha "Yellowcake" or, manufacturing a bogus story about Iraqi WMDs

Context is always important--a fact too often lost in the posts at Libertarian Republican.

Today's post, for example, is entitled Saddam Hussein's WMD enabling yellow cake shipped to Canada: How will the Anti-War Libertarians ever explain this one? Here's the mud that Eric Dondero attempts to fling at Iraq war critics among the Libertarian movement (and presumably all you other Iraq war critics as well):

Early in the War, in 2003, two US Soldiers were hospitalized for burns suffered while handling sarin and mustard gas laced weaponry on the battlefield. Additionally that same year, weapons inspector teams uncovered plans for Hussein's WMD program burried in the rose garden of one of Saddam's top weapons scientists. In 2004, Polish Soldiers uncovered a number of missiles in an abandoned warehouse, and a year after that, US Soldiers found 500 additional sarin and mustard gas laced missiles in another warehouse.

Both stories were mentioned by the media in passing, and largely written off as "old weaponry too old for active use."

Predictably, the Anti-War wing of the libertarian movement echoed the explanations of the liberal media. On libertarian blog after blog, when confronted with the stories, Anti-war Libertarians just shrugged, and when the news died down, they went on with their rants: "Where's the WMD? Bush said the reason we invaded Iraq was WMD. So, where's the WMD?"


He then cites part of an AP story on the sale by the current Iraqi government to Canada of tons of low-grade, non-enriched uranium (known as Yellowcake) from the Tuwaitha reactor complex as evidence that large-scale WMDs were there all the time.

For this he castigates those pesky anti-war Libertarians:

Another weapon has fallen off the shelf in the arsenal of the Anti-War wing of the libertarian movement. For years, they shouted to Pro-War on Islamo-Fascism libertarians "Where's the WMD, where's the WMD?" Now, that it has been found conclusively, actually for at least the 5th time now, there's dead silence from the Anti-War camp.

Now, look for the Anti-Warists to pick up the rant again in a few weeks or months: "Bush lied... there was never any WMD." Problem for them, this time Pro-Defense Libertarians will be watching
.


Well, if so-called Pro-Defense Libertarians allow themselves to be misled by Eric's ridiculous post, then they will unfortunately self-identify as morons.

Why?

Because the Tuwaitha nuclear fuel dump has been well-documented back prior to the First Gulf War, and has never been associated with WMD claims by the Bush administration.

Again, why?

Because in 1991, immediately following the Gulf War, the much-maligned International Atomic Energy Agency removed all stocks of fissile uranium from the Tuwaitha plant, sealed the low-grade ore in containers, and re-inspected them for damage or removal on an annual basis until evicted from the country.

As Global Security.org puts it

Following the 1991 Gulf War, the International Atomic Energy Agency removed all known Iraqi stocks of highly enriched uranium and plutonium, in accordance with the provisions of UN Security Council Resolution 687. As of 2002 the only positively confirmed nuclear material left in Iraq is 1.8 tons of low-enriched uranium and several tons of natural and depleted uranium. The material is in a locked storage site at the Tuwaitha nuclear research facility near Baghdad. Under the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, this stock of material is checked once a year by an IAEA team. The most recent check was in January 2002, and none of the material had been tampered with at that time.


Nor did Secretary of State Colin Powell even reference Tuwaitha in his now-famous presentation to the UN Security Council.

In May 2003, the administration released a sensationalized story that our Marines had captured Tuwaitha and possibly detected WMD evidence:

The site, 18 miles south of Baghdad, was secured by Marines in early April. Their tests, and subsequent tests by Army weapons experts at the site, detected what could be plutonium. Further tests to determine the nature of the materials have not yet been conducted there.


Of course, the Bush administration was more reluctant to admit that it had refused access to the IAEI, which had detailed inventories for the material stored there, and could have clarified in a matter of days whether anything had been disturbed since 2002. (Guess what? Turned out there was no plutonium there after all.)

In fact, Dubya and his boys were so certain that there was nothing significant at Tuwaitha in a WMD sense that, in October 2003, Coalition forces turned control of facility back to Iraqi security forces and the Iraqi government, which began salvage and rebuilding operations. Eventually, the Iraqis decided to sell the material to a Canadian firm because they were worried about Al Qaeda or other insurrectionists getting hold of some of it to make low-level dirty bombs.

So here's the point: the smoking gun that Eric Dondero thinks he sees or smells in the AP story about the Tuwaitha yellowcake sale to Canada is a piece of old news that appears in an overly sensationalist wire story that is light on facts.

The best advice for Pro-Defense Libertarians like Eric Dondero: if you want credibility beyond the right-wing world of gotcha talking points, actually do some research before you run a story claiming WMDs have been found in Iraq.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...