Skip to main content

Why Libertarian T. J. Rohr deserves to be in the North Carolina General Assembly

Recently I posted about local news coverage of Lenoir City Councilman T. J. Rohr's campaign for North Carolina House District 87 against long-time incumbent Ed Starnes. I mentioned in particular that Rohr had something going for him that few Libertarian candidates can claim: a record as an incumbent in his own right.

To be honest, I didn't know much about that record at the time, but with a little research, it's amazing what you sometimes find--like the fact that T. J. was the only person on the Lenoir City Council to realize that the town was about to be taken to the cleaners by Google.

From Governing.com [by Zach Patton]:

The small city of Lenoir, North Carolina, is more High Country than high tech. Snuggled against the Blue Ridge foothills 70 miles northwest of Charlotte, Lenoir lost most of the textile and furniture plants that employed its residents for much of the 20th century. So when Google recently came to Lenoir looking for a site to build a new data-storage facility, local and state officials were eager to accommodate. They offered the Internet giant a tax-incentive package worth a staggering $260 million. In January, Google accepted the deal.

It sounds like any city’s economic development dream: A fast-growing company, one that is defining the second Internet boom, plants a massive $600 million facility in your backyard. But it’s doubtful that the city of Lenoir and the state of North Carolina will see much direct return from that investment. That’s because the generous property tax abatements they gave Google last for 30 years. Moreover, only about 200 people will work there, mostly administrators and technicians. Google will pocket state and local subsidies worth more than $1.2 million per job....

Cities and states are eager to capture a piece of this Internet industry. What they’re finding, however, is that this part of the “new” economy doesn’t look so different from the old one. Like any manufacturing plant, server farms require massive amounts of power. A mid-sized server farm built a bit larger than a typical Costco consumes as much electricity as the Sears Tower. Not only do governments need to ensure that there’s enough electric capacity available, they also must wrestle with the environmental consequences of their power choices....

If server farms drain electricity and don’t provide that many jobs, why are states and localities scrambling to attract them? Lenoir’s leaders believe that Google’s cachet will draw more technology firms to town. T.J. Rohr, the only city councilman to vote against the tax incentives, hopes that’s true. But he doesn’t think the generous package was worth it. “We probably could have driven a better bargain,” Rohr says, noting that he’s philosophically opposed to tax incentives of any kind. “I don’t have any problem with Google. Who could? Who would? But Google didn’t come here because of our incentives. They came here because there’s cheap land and cheap electricity.”


You can find T. J.'s own, more detailed explanation here.

The only man smart enough to vote to turn Google down might make one hell of a campaign slogan, huh?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...