Skip to main content

Scandal in the First State! Delawareliberal engaged in sexist contest!

Realizing that I am not by any means a Democrat, I support the idea of gathering funds for Tom Noyes to attend the Dem National Convention, if only out of state pride.

But I am appalled, I tell you, truly appalled, at the sexist miscogynist Delaware's Hottest Blogger contest being conducted without any shame whatsoever over at Delawareliberal, in which dv, jason, and liberalgeek are doing the equivalent of crotch-grabbing for twenties to be stuffed in their undershorts.

[Incidentally, I understand that there is plenty of room in said shorts, there being nothing else much in residence. Slimy liberals.]

What I want to know is where are the lovely cassandra and the enticing pandora, who--if the inferences to be drawn from their postings--are truly the people's candidates for Delaware's Hottest Bloggers.

I sense a sexist double-standard liberal plot here.

But you can venture over the Delawareliberal yourself (delawareliberal.net--sorry, can't paste in links on this public computer) and shake your head in disapproval.

cassandra? pandora? Surely you are not going to let these dweebs carry off the crown!?

Your essential hotness shows through in every post you write. Get out there and shake it ladies.

And everyone else, remember, the proceeds of all votes at the next Drinking Liberally on July 31 go toward sending Tom to Denver for the convention.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Tell me that you'll be there, Steve. And... that I can count on your vote!

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...