Skip to main content

WWAGD? What would Albert Gallatin do?

A number of libertarians around the country have been thinking about what might replace the national structure of the dysfunctional Libertarian National Committee, and what you call it. Art Torrey pointed out that the Boston Tea Party might be problematic in that regard; what would you call a member? A teaper? A BTPer?

This is actually more of a serious problem than you might think.

There are also some people mooting the idea of a new libertarian think-tank, and similarly looking for a name for that enterprise.

I'm thinking we should create the Gallatin Foundation, after Albert Gallatin (1761-1841), the longest incumbent as Secretary of the Treasury.

I've been wondering what Gallatin would make of the current fiscal crisis. He was the man who pioneered the idea of withholding funds from the Executive branch when it attempted to perform actions not specifically authorized by Congress or the Constitution. He managed to purchase the Louisiana Territory without resorting to raising taxes, and in 1812 when the US Army was invading Canada, Gallatin forced the army [at least temporarily] to turn back because Congress had not appropriated funds for it to operate outside the country.

L. Neil Smith made Gallatin the hero of his alternate history SF novel The Probability Broach, honoring him as the first President of the North American Confederacy that succeeds the United States.

Looking at today's financial crisis, I don't have to wonder too hard to answer the question: What Would Albert Gallatin Do?

Albert Gallatin would not only have refused to intervene in private contracts, he would have begun ruthlessly weeding the US Government of its unconstitutional powers, bureaus, and agencies. He would have insisted that both taxation and government should be reduced to the smallest practical extent, so as not to interfere with the rights of American citizens.

A Gallatin Foundation would be a fitting tribute to one of the first great libertarians in American history.

Unfortunately, I can't think of any way to name a political party after him, but I'm still working on it.

Comments

Gallatinpots? Galas? Grand Old Gallatin? Parti du Gallatin? We're Not Like The Other Parties, God. Guns. Gallatin. Liberte' Fraternite' Gallatine'

Just some thoughts.
Thomas L. Knapp said…
"Art Torrey pointed out that the Boston Tea Party might be problematic in that regard; what would you call a member? A teaper? A BTPer?"

A libertarian.
Brian Shields said…
Oolongolian?

How about The Sons of Liberty?
Anonymous said…
I think that LNS offers a couple of possible answers as to what to call a member of a party named after Gallatin - namely a "Gallatinist", with the name for policies / actions in the style of the party being "Gallatinite" in nature...

As another alternative is the name of the LP (sort of) equivalent in the original world of the Probability Broach, namely the "Propertarian Party". I was seeing the potential train wreck of the LP coming when I met L. Neil in Denver, and I specifically asked him if he would mind someone starting a "Propertarian Party" using some of his ideas - he thought it would be wonderful, long as he didn't have to be involved.

While I understand the issues that some have with "Libertarian Macho Flashing", I have often wondered just what would happen results wise if we had a major candidate that ran a hard core "Bill of Rights Enforcement" based campaign of the sort that L. Neil has encouraged in many of his essays, and particularly in his novel w/ Richard Zelman "Hope" - (Highly reccommended BTW) - I think such a candidate could potentially pull much more support than our past record of running non-offensive candidates that come across as being only slightly less bad than the D & R offerings (or Worse in the case of Barr / Root)

BTW, thanks for the mention!

ART

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba