... is made clear by this latest US violation of national sovereignty with [a helicopter strike into Syria]:
This is not only another example of Dubya's incredibly dangerous foreign policy, but dangerously consistent with the kinds of unilateral tactical interventions that both Senator JohnMcCain and Barack Obama have suggested they'd be willing to make.
Even more disturbing is that just hours ago the US was still denying the attacking forces had crossed the Syrian border:
Notice the nuance here. LTC Hughes denies that the US division that operates on the Iraqi side of the border was not involved in the incident, while later a US military spokesman admitted that special forces not accountable to the regional commander had conducted the raid. Clever wordplay, eh?
None of this can disguise that US conduct is becoming increasingly lawless its conduct of foreign policy, and nothing that's going to happen on November 4 stands to change this unless it's us--the American people.
DAMASCUS, Syria (Oct. 26) – U.S. military helicopters launched an extremely rare attack Sunday on Syrian territory close to the border with Iraq, killing eight people in a strike the government in Damascus condemned as "serious aggression."
A U.S. military official said the raid by special forces targeted the foreign fighter network that travels through Syria into Iraq. The Americans have been unable to shut the network down in the area because Syria was out of the military's reach.
"We are taking matters into our own hands," the official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the political sensitivity of cross-border raids.
The attack came just days after the commander of U.S. forces in western Iraq said American troops were redoubling efforts to secure the Syrian border, which he called an "uncontrolled" gateway for fighters entering Iraq.
A Syrian government statement said the helicopters attacked the Sukkariyeh Farm near the town of Abu Kamal, five miles inside the Syrian border. Four helicopters attacked a civilian building under construction shortly before sundown and fired on workers inside, the statement said.
The government said civilians were among the dead, including four children.
A resident of the nearby village of Hwijeh said some of the helicopters landed and troops exited the aircraft and fired on a building. He said the aircraft flew along the Euphrates River into the area of farms and several brick factories. The witness spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information.
This is not only another example of Dubya's incredibly dangerous foreign policy, but dangerously consistent with the kinds of unilateral tactical interventions that both Senator JohnMcCain and Barack Obama have suggested they'd be willing to make.
Even more disturbing is that just hours ago the US was still denying the attacking forces had crossed the Syrian border:
Lieutenant-Colonel Chris Hughes, a spokesman for US forces in western Iraq, said the US division that operates on the Iraqi side of the border was not involved in the incident.
A Pentagon spokesman in Washington said he had no immediate information on the reported strike but would check further while the White House and CIA declined to comment.
Notice the nuance here. LTC Hughes denies that the US division that operates on the Iraqi side of the border was not involved in the incident, while later a US military spokesman admitted that special forces not accountable to the regional commander had conducted the raid. Clever wordplay, eh?
None of this can disguise that US conduct is becoming increasingly lawless its conduct of foreign policy, and nothing that's going to happen on November 4 stands to change this unless it's us--the American people.
Comments
Whereas the United States of America has a military presence in over 130 countries and
Whereas in accordance with Article 1 Section 8, the Congress has not Declared War since 1942 and
Whereas such War ended in 1945
Be it RESOLVED that the Boston Tea Party calls for an immediate cease-fire of all military conflict and
Be it RESOLVED that the Boston Tea Party calls for an immediate removal of all military personnel from all foreign nations and
Be it RESOLVED that the Boston Tea Party calls for an immediate closure of all military bases in all foreign nations.
As for the BTP resolution, isn't that a unilateral abrogation of our treaty obligations? NATO is the most obvious one, but we have mutual defense and basing agreements around the world, like with Japan and Korea. I'm sorta new to this whole Libertarian thing, but is your party's underlying point that we're only permitted by the Constitution to maintain our forces within our own borders and sally forth only when attacked by a hostile state or states?