Skip to main content

Faux Poll For The Readers

A pretty basic one, at that: in your approach to issues of public policy, do you tend to value freedom or equality more? Why?

I realize that this is going to have a significant bias, but I'm interested to hear.

Comments

tom said…
No question about it, I prefer freedom.

Although in theory there shouldn't be much difference - as long as you're talking about equality of opportunity and not Harrison Bergeron style equality, and you are trying to achieve equality by maximizing rather than minimizing opportunities for everyone.
March 16, 2009 at 5:28 PM
Steven H. Newton said…
Mat
I'll play, but while I'd obviously prefer freedom, there are different freedoms and different equalities:

Freedom to fail
Equality of opportunity
Equality of outcome

If you are going to drill for information, maybe a better definition is in order.
March 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM
a most peculiar nature said…
I had the same question as Steve. What exactly do you mean by "equality". Tom gives two different definitions. What is yours in the context of this question?
March 16, 2009 at 6:38 PM
tom said…
Actually tom doesn't care so much about the definition of equality as how you go about implementing it.

Government mandated equality of any definition has a strong tendency to drag everyone toward the lowest common denominator.
March 16, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Anonymous said…
Equality (rightly defined, in the sense of Locke). We derive liberty/freedom as a consequence of this correct view of equality.

cf. Roderick Long's Equality: The Unknown Ideal
March 16, 2009 at 7:34 PM
Anonymous said…
Government mandated equality of any definition has a strong tendency to drag everyone toward the lowest common denominator.

If the government is making such a mandate, it's explicitly asserting that we are unequal to it. Under a reasonable definition of equality, the government would be seen to lack the authority to mandate such a move.
March 16, 2009 at 7:38 PM
Mike W. said…
I definitely prefer freedom.

equality of outcome is an unachievable ideal.
March 16, 2009 at 9:52 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...
22 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more