Skip to main content

I would have never thought...

....that longtime News-Journal editorialist Ron Williams, of the Delaware Way, would be for something so counter-establishment and innovative as eliminating the bloated, over-priced, mismanaged, heavy-handed Wilmington City Government, in favor of a more efficient, less costly "metropolitan" form of government.

But apparently he is, commenting on jurisdictional tension between state and county police. (In the same article he exposes yet more burrowing of patronage-seeking dregs in the state government, this time involving Harris McDowell and Karen Weldin-Stewart.) :

"Of course, this little flap with overlapping police coverage focuses on the millions of dollars spent annually to pay for overlapping police coverage. If, as I've been told more than once, New Castle County Police is an excellent, nationally recognized department, why do we need state police patrols?

We can also move into the discussion about why Wilmington needs its own police when it could be absorbed into a metropolitan department with the county. But don't hold a breath on metro police, let alone government. It makes too much sense."



Wilmington's careerist electeds and bloated middle/upper gov't management, as well as city-centric patronage, would cease to exist.

The city's operating budget and services would be managed by county government, perhaps with a specific administrative division (given the population concentration and specifically-urban issues).

However both entities (Wilmington and New Castle County) are run by Democrats, none of whom wants any government-reduction/consolidation measures, much less a smart one like this.

Obviously City government careerists don't want their $142M a year patronage scam upset.

Obviously County government doesn't want to have to absorb and deal with the massive wasteful patronage-driven mess that has become the City government. (Who can blame them?).

As long as Delaware is top to bottom Democrat, the party of government, we will never see such progress or common sense come to a state that is so small yet so layered with so much government larder, piled on top of anyone living here, especially in Wilmington.

Thanks for pointing it out, Ron.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Another great post. Thx Tyler.
Anonymous said…
Can we hope against hope that out of Markell's good government promise that he will do something about policing overlap and education administration overlap etc. ?

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...