Skip to main content

Just a thought about Governor Markell's across-the-board salary cut ...

... which leads me into political hypocrisy land.

Our liberal and progressive friends in the Delaware blogosphere (and I am NOT being facetious with this comment) have always held up the progressive income tax as the foundation of an equitable society: those who make more should pay a higher percentage.

They attack regressive taxes like Social Security or gas taxes that take a disproportionate amount of income from the people who have the least income, while affecting the rich not at all.

So here's my question: why isn't Governor Markell's 8-10% across-the-board salary/benefits cut for State employees considered as a regressive tax?

If the governor were truly a progressive in the political sense of the word (and as all his supporters expected him to be), why doesn't the State employee salary/benefit cut list look something like this (please note: not a serious chart for research purposes, just an illustration):

Employees making under $35K: no cut
Employees making from $36-$50K: 3% cut
Employees making from $51-75K: 5% cut
Employees making from $76-100K: 8% cut
Employees making from $101-150K: 12% cut
Employes making above $150K: 16%


Why shouldn't the managers, supervisors, etc., who could not find ways to cut their budgets other than by cutting the salaries of their lowest-paid employees, be asked to accept a greater share of the burden?

And why shouldn't everybody in the State in the legislature, in the cabinet, and as the directors of all these agencies not be required to take at least a 15% pay cut until they can manage their agencies more effectively?

I'd be able to make some difficult choices, but then I'd never get elected.

Just askin'.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I like this idea, Steve.
Anonymous said…
Me, too.

anonone
Delaware Watch said…
You get no argument from on this progressive, Steve. In fact, I plan on writing how Markell's wage cut for state employees is viciously regressive. It will throw some state employees into the ranks of the officially poor. I'm appalled.
Anonymous said…
Regressive tax as you laid out here sounds like common sense approach. It appears the suits surrounding Jack on stuck on mirrors mantra....cuts across the board.

Families of the Disabled Network were listening intently today to see how the most vulnerable disabled will fair in his proposal, didnt get anything on it.

Could this idea be expanded to include a progressive property tax? The bigger your mansion the more tax you pay? Any thoughts.

Corporate taxes, the bigger your corporation the higher your corporaate tax and franchise fees?

Today we found out that many banks getting bail outs owe taxes...how many are headquartered in Delaware? any tax revenue we are missing out on?
Dana,
I would have expected nothing else from you,

:)
Tyler Nixon said…
Me six!

My problem with government focuses on the middle-management bureaucracy and the 'fat cats', not the working stiffs.

You can cut a lot money a lot faster by thinning out the herd at the top and middle, than by dumping a bunch of the lower-income people doing the shit work at the bottom.

Unfortunately the lower-income people who are on the front lines of providing services are treated like pawns to be either played or sacrificed, it would seem, at the shifty hands of 6-figure earning careerists and political ladder-climbers.
Anonymous said…
The responses are very good ideas but the Governor's plan is a good start. At least the employees had some input into the choice of cut in pay versus cut in employees. The idea of a progressive pay cut is excellent but the example given isn't thought out enough. It is not enough to change the rate at specific levels, one must only change the percentage on earnings ABOVE that level, otherwise we have a very regressive situation where say someone who earned $34,999 has no cut but someone who earns $35,001 would have a total of say a 3% cut which means their net would be $33,950.97. That harldy seems fair. Another problem would be that the bulk of the state payroll is already in the lower pay levels. Still another problem would be the cost of implementing such a relatively complicated, properly progressive formula. How much would then be eaten up in increased costs to the Delaware Dept. of Treasury? Of course there is room for tweaking the plan but let's recognize that it is better than contributing to the unemployment lines.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?