Skip to main content

My grandson...

... already wants a do-over on the year 2009.

And at least one of the reasons should make you sit up and take notice if you have a child below the age of six.

On January 4, he and my son were horsing around (reading wrestling, struggling, fighting, shooting at each other, whatever) in the basement area of the house set aside for childhood mayhem.

Shane jumped from a couch cushion eighteen inches high onto a heavily carpeted floor ... and broke his leg.

Six weeks in a full leg cast.

The day he got the cast off, we also scheduled him for a routine visit to the eye doctor. One reason: why not bunch as many appointments on the same day as possible. Second reason: his mom had only recently gotten a full-time job with healthcare benefits. Third reason: we'd recently gotten one of those routine notes from the school nurse that his vision check suggested he might need a follow-up.

If you have kids in school you get those notes on a fairly regular basis.

So he's got the cast off for all of forty-five minutes and the eye doctor tells his mom: His left eye is not focusing at all. He's going to have to wear and eye-patch over the right eye for the next five weeks, and special glasses for the next several years to avoid going blind in that eye by the time he's nine.

Not a great day at the household. Fortunately, little kids are resilient, and now the patch and glasses have become part of the normal routine. His vision seems to be improving, but what the hell do I know?

Two lessons I learned from this:

1) Little kids don't know that they don't see well because they have no reason to think whatever they see is not normal. And the smart little kids--according to our eye doctor--often cheat on vision tests because they think it's a game. So if they can't read the chart from a distance, they will actually sneak up and memorize it before their test. Sometimes they even get other kids to tell them the answers.

2) People are boors. It's amazing the number of unfriendly (and, yes, I mean that word) stares and intrusive, obnoxious questions you get from people if you are with a child wearing an eye patch. Did he put his eye out? Can I see under the patch? Is he going blind? I've even experienced people picking up their kids and shuffling them away, because apparently an eye patch and glasses are indications of virulently contagious junior leprosy.

So if you've got little kids, think strongly about that vision check-up.

And if you see me out with my grandson, act like you've got some class.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Oh man, if one of my kids has to go the eye-patch route, it's gonna be a Pirate Party until he or she tells me I am boring the hell out of him/her. There's an opportunity in just about anything.
Anonymous said…
Steve, my son, at the same age, had the same problem. I am happy to report that by the age of nine the glasses were gone and his vision was corrected.

Good luck!
Anonymous said…
Manoman, Steve. Best of luck, mi amigo.

Cripes, I feel quite blessed that our daughter, now almost 15, hasn't suffered through anything worse than the flu!
My reaction to a kid and eye patch would probably be "Coooooool" ! Probably not the best response either.

Good luck with this. Kids are pretty resilient, much more than us old folk.
Anonymous said…
Steve, just keep his spirits up. We dealth with similar issues and my son is doing great.
David said…
You all need to move downstate. We don't shuffle our children away from kids with an eye patch or wheelchair or whatever else.

My he have a speedy recovery
Delaware Watch said…
I wish your grandson a speedy & complete recovery.
Bowly said…
My little brother went through the eyepatch thing when we were kids. Watch him, he will peek when he thinks he can get away with it. But lil bro has long since been OK, and here's hoping your young'un has the same luck.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...