Skip to main content

A Thought on Government...

... that I'm not sure is Libertarian or devoted to any other ideology.

But it interested me, because I was thinking about the limited number of types of things that government can do--any government.

It seems to me that, domestically, pretty much all government acts fall into one of three categories (in no particular order):

Taxation--and the enforcement thereof.

Regulation--and the enforcement thereof.

Services--and the provision thereof.

Regulation as I am using it here refers not just to regulation in the sense of, say, sanitary rules for restaurants or inspection standards for pissed-off cows, but to laws that in any sense regulate human behavior (laws against murder, embezzlement, etc.) You could arguably separate laws and regulations, but I think that functionally there is a lot to be said for considering them together.

Services, here, is also considered to include redistributive movement of wealth (i.e., wealth transferred to States or wealth transferred to individuals in the form of Food Stamps, etc.)

I'm curious to see if anybody can come up with a major category of government act that does not fall into one of these categories.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'd suggest broadening the category of "taxation" to include non-financial items. (Call it "tribute," perhaps.) Consider a draft, for example. Service suggests something that the government is offering you (and which hypothetically you could turn down). Regulation suggests that the government is forcing you not to do something. Taxation seems more generally to get at the idea that the government is forcibly taking something away from you, and so seems the most logical place to put it.

Although, if we're going to accept the idea that service is a voluntary category, it would need to be split into two to handle distinctions between, say, things you can voluntarily apply for like food stamps and things that you can't turn down like bombing villages overseas. In fact, war seems to be a common denominator in many of the above, so it might be worthwhile to add it as a separate category: regulation being the use of force against people the government considers to be under its jurisdiction, and war the use of force against those that it does not so consider.

That said, it'd be quite a stretch to fit attrocities like the Holocaust into any of those categories.

Also, there's going to be some overlap: is government-mandated education a service being provided or a regulation being enforced?
Miko
Several good points: one of the reasons I excluded everything not domestic for the initial question.

I think "services" would be reasonably divided into "voluntary" and "required" as you suggest without doing harm to the concept.

I tend to view regulation pretty broadly: both meat inspections and prison systems regulate people's behavior.

You're right about potential overlap.

What I'm playing with here is the idea of developing least-common denominators for all governments....

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...