Skip to main content

Independent Party of Delaware endorses Scott Gesty for US House


Independent Party of Delaware endorses Libertarian Scott Gesty for US House
For immediate release

In a move creating the strongest “third-party” ticket that Delaware has ever seen, the Independent Party of Delaware has endorsed Libertarian Scott Gesty for US House of Representatives.  The endorsement potentially pairs Gesty with IPOD’s high-profile US Senate candidate, Alex Pires of Dewey Beach.

Scott’s commitment to individual Liberty, the Constitution, truth, justice and economic freedom make him a viable alternative to politics as usual,” said IPOD Chair Wolfgang von Baumgart in a Sunday evening statement.  “Delaware needs a true representative of the people, not special interests.”

Gesty is Director of Training and Development for BNY Mellon, and a longtime activist with the Delaware Campaign for Liberty.  Along with his wife Maria and daughter Virginia he lives in Brandywine Hundred.

“I’m going to campaign on my beliefs and John Carney’s abysmal record as Delaware’s only Congressman,” Gesty said.  He sees the critical issues in this year’s campaign as resisting Federal interference with local control of public schools, restoring financial sanity to government operations, ending the war on drugs, and getting the US out of Afghanistan.

“Carney has been on the wrong side of all those issues,” Gesty insists.  “He can raise hundreds of thousands of dollars in special interest money, but I intend to make it difficult for him to run away from his own record.”

Gesty sought and received the nomination of the Libertarian Party of Delaware at its May convention in Dover.

Comments

Unknown said…
Thank you for the info. It sounds pretty user friendly. I guess I’ll pick one up for fun. thank u

Independent House in Chennai

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici