Skip to main content

Judge Jim Gray to appear at DSU on 18 September: the details


Retired California Superior Court Judge Jim Gray, the Libertarian Party Vice-Presidential nominee, will appear at Delaware State University’s MLK Student Center on Tuesday, September 18, at 6:00pm.

Gray and his running mate, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, have been polling around 5% nationwide, and as high as 9-10% in some states.  They are widely considered to be the most qualified pair of candidates that the Libertarian Party has ever nominated.

Following the general theme of “What do Libertarians think?” Gray will be discussing the ticket’s vision of cutting the Federal budget, replacing the Income Tax with the Fair Tax, ending the “war on drugs,” and bringing American troops home from overseas.  He will also speak about marriage equality.

Gray is a nationally known figure in the movement to legalize marijuana.

“It’s always exciting when a national candidate comes to speak,” said Scott Gesty, the Libertarian candidate for US House in Delaware, who will introduce Gray at the event.  “In this case, it’s particularly appropriate because the Democrats and Republicans are trying to silence our ticket on the national stage, just like they are doing in Delaware.”

Gesty referred to the potential exclusion of Johnson and Gray from the televised presidential debates, which parallels the expected refusal of the University of Delaware and Delaware First Media to allow third party candidates to join their debate for statewide candidates in mid-October.

Other local and statewide Libertarian candidates will also be appearing at the event.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...