OK Bloggers, The race is on. We need some research to fulfill the needs of our deviant liberal friends, which nation or group of nations, the US, South East Asia, or China has the highest documentable rate of prostitution? I will give you a clue, the US and China do not post real numbers or give you the actual scale of the problem. As we all know what a fat horn dog Ben Franklin was, I thought this quantification of prostitution rates might make him proud.
I am not sure how proud he would be to know that there is a hooker dance party community in his native Philadelphia.
At the same time, I want to make it very clear that I find this type of exploitation deplorable and want to find ways and have helped the Global Mission for Comprehensive Human Development find ways to create better paying jobs for people who were forced into this lurid business.
I am not sure how proud he would be to know that there is a hooker dance party community in his native Philadelphia.
At the same time, I want to make it very clear that I find this type of exploitation deplorable and want to find ways and have helped the Global Mission for Comprehensive Human Development find ways to create better paying jobs for people who were forced into this lurid business.
But one thing is clear according to the interviews we have conducted, independent Hookers (without a pimp) have more fun. Those with a pimp are as miserable as Solzhenitsyn under Stalin. The independent ones feel more free than other people who always follow the rules. It begs the question would a libertarian government where everyone feels more free actually decrease prostitution?
Comments
Thank you. Now I know where to move if John McCain wins the presidency. Brian
Nonetheless, I have decided to beat the rush and left the country three years ago. Well, three years tomorrow, to be precise.
I am sorry you feel that way about Obama. I think if you look at the Rev. John Hagee's statements on behalf of McCain you will understand my apprehension. "Bring about Armeggedon..." Uh-ugh. Nope. That does not jive in political logic except in a theocracy. Brian
I dislike Obama for a host of reasons, most recently for his "nuanced" position on NAFTA and trade related issues.
I doubt McCain will be issuing in a theocracy. Dubya couldn't (FMA failed, for example) and he had a GOP congress for much of his term. McCain seems less likely to want one, and will be facing a Democratic congress.
That last bit sums up why I (slightly) prefer McCain; I subscribe to the split government theory. But of course I could be off my rocker.
McCain's just trying to get conservatives to show up to vote at this point. It's about the same as lying to a bunch of autoworkers that you're going to repeal NAFTA, I suppose. Maybe I should give Obama a break.
I encourage you to read my critique of of NAFTA and CAFTA issues by the Friends through Nobel Laureate Joe Stigliz. Through another nobel star John Nash's theory of development, I know how we can do trade much better.
Brian