Skip to main content

What would Ben Franklin have said to a Lesbian?


It's not necessarily such a bizarre question, since we seem to be so concerned about the original intent of the Founding Fathers over the past few decades.

So, from a shoebox left in my garage by a previous tenant, is a heretofore unknown letter from the man who (genetically speaking) had the best claim to being the Father of Our Country and the man who (had we only followed his advice) would have made sure the Wild Turkey was not only a drink.

August 30, 1767

My Dear Lady,

I know of no Medicine, Device or Appliance fit to diminish the surging inclinations you mention; and if I did, I think I should not communicate it to you. Marriage is the most proper and natural remedy, the State in which you are mostly likely to find solid Happiness. Your Feelings against the Male Sex and your Reasons against not entering into the State of Matrimony, appear to me not well-founded. There are, as you know, no circumstantial Advantages in View to a Woman alone or two Women together that can be considered in comparison with that of the Thing itself, the being married and settled. It is the Man and Woman united that make the compleat human Being. Separate, she wants his Force of Body and Penetrational Strength; he, her Softness, Sensibility and alternative orifices. A Woman alone, or two Women together, are much less likely to succeed in the World, not least for the lack of Public Approbation for their living Arrangements, and a tendency for the Majority of Citizens as well as the Force of Law and Custom to censure such behavior as either Sinful or Contrary to the Natural Order. If you will but find an industrious healthy Husband, his industry in his Profession combined with your good Economy, will result in a fortune sufficient, and over the Bounds of Time and with the application of mechanical enhancements turn Apprehension into Familiarity; Familiarity into Fondness; and Fondness into Love.

But if you will not or cannot take this Counsel, and persist in believing that your bodily Commerce with others of the same Sex is inevitable, then I repeat my former Advice, that in all your Amours you should prefer old Women to young ones. You call this a Paradox, and demand my reasons. They are these:

i. Because as they have more Knowledge of the World and their Minds are better stor’d with Observations, their Conversation is more improving and more lastingly agreeable, their tongues having developed both Facility and Experience.

ii. Because when Women cease to be handsome, they study to be good. To maintain their Influence within the Relationship, they supply the Diminution of Beauty by an Assemblage of Utilities. They learn to do 1000 services small and great, and are the most tender and amiable of all Friends when you are sick. Thus they continue amiable. And hence there is hardly such a thing to be found as an old Woman who is not a good Woman.

iii. Because having passed their child bearing years, the lustful portion of your relationship will be secreted without the necessity of Plaid, which otherwise may be attended with much public outcry and inconvenience.

iv. Because thro’ more Experience, an elderly Sapphic Woman will be more prudent and discreet in conducting their intrigues to prevent Suspicion. Such Commerce with them is therefore safer with regard to you Reputation. And with regard theirs, if your Arrangements should happen to be known, considerate People might be rather inclin’d to excuse an old Woman who would so considerately take care of a young Woman, form her tastes for the necessary appliances, and prevent her ruining her Health and Fortune in the application of such vile cosmetics, or the piercing of flesh, which will often be necessary for both the Seduction and the Retension of a younger Woman.

v. Because in every Animal that walks upright, the Deficiency of the Fluids that fill the Muscles appears first in the highest Part: The Face first grows lank and wrinkled; then the Neck; then the Breast and Arms; the lower Parts continuing to the last as plump as ever: So that covering all above with a Basket, and regarding only what is below the Girdle, it is impossible of two Women to know an old from a young one. And as in the Dark all Cats are grey and all boats can be thought to float, the Pleasure of corporal Enjoyment with an old Sapphic Woman is at least equal, and frequently superior, every Knack being by Practice capable of improvement.

vi. Because the Sin is less. The debauching a Virgin may be her Ruin, especially if the Affair includes injurious probing without the proper Natural or Artificial lubrication, and make her resultant Pleasure with other paramours too infrequent.

vii. Because the Compunction is less. The having made a young Girl miserable, especially should she later be destined for the service of the Cock, may give you frequent bitter Reflections; none of which can attend the making an old Woman both happy and well-filled.

viii. Lastly They are so grateful!!


Thus much for my Paradox. But I still advise you to put away all implements of Childish Exploration and marry directly; being sincerely

Your affectionate Friend.

Benj. Franklin


Who knows what advice he might have given to a straight guy the same day?

Comments

Some things never change. Coming across a lesbian, he'd want to (1) watch, and (2) try to do them both.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...