Skip to main content

Even more curiouser and curiouser: the Munger Effect in North Carolina

Yesterday Public Policy Polling released its latest presidential numbers for North Carolina, and I did a detailed examination of the so-called Barr Effect.

This poll focuses on State offices (Governor down), and the only Libertarian it considers is gubernatorial candidate Michael Munger. This makes sense when you realize that it was only two days ago that the Libertarian Party of North Carolina announced its slate of 38 candidates statewide. Hopefully, by the time PPP does its next poll, we'll see at least a little impact from some of them.

Michael Munger, however, is already having a BIG impact on the race.

Democrat Bev Perdue now leads Republican Pat McCrory by one point (42-41%). Michael Munger is up to polling 5%, with undecided at 12%. Most pundits had assumed, when Munger entered the race, that any votes he pulled would come from McCrory. But--as with Bob Barr--the reality is far more complex.

Munger gets 5% of women, 6% of men--no real surprise there.

Munger gets 3% of Democrats, 5% of Republicans, and 13% of independents. As with Bob Barr I speculate that many of these independents are actually the thousands of Libertarians disenfranchises by the State two years ago. Barr, however, carried equal numbers of Dems and GOPers--Munger clearly is playing better with Republicans.

Like Barr, however, Munger is showing strongly among non-white voters: the Libertarian gets only 4% of white voters, 7% of African-Americans, and 18% of Other. Presumably, Other in NC is primarily hispanic.

Why are both Barr and Munger actually doing better among African-American voters and other minorities than they are among whites? I'll hazard one wild guess below.

With respect to age groups, Munger is clearly polling better among the younger voters than Barr:

18-29: 10%
20-45: 5%
46-65: 4%
Over 65: 4%

For comparison, here are Barr's numbers (and his base in the overall voting is also 5%):

Age 18-29: 7%
Age 30-45: 3%
Age 46-65: 6%
Older than 65: 7%

Barr has a clearly more social conservative message than Munger, which accounts for the fact that his support goes up as voters get older. Munger's tails off; but more of the younger Ron Paul-type voters seem to cotton to Munger.

Issue-specific, here's how Munger fares (with Barr's numbers for the same issues in parenthesis for comparison):

War in Iraq: 5% (5%)
Education: 2% (2%)
Economy and Jobs: 4% (3%)
Taxes: 13% (12%)
Moral and Family Issues: (5%) 6%
Health Care: 2% (8%)
Immigration: 11% (18%)

There is remarkable consistency between the numbers that Barr and Munger post on everything but Health Care and Immigration, both of which show Barr doing significantly better. I can't explain the Health Care numbers, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the possibility that Barr's rather un-Libertarian views on Immigration (which have caused a ruckus in the blogosphere) are playing better among Tarheel voters than Mike Munger's far more measured stance.

Which does not mean, Mike, that I think you should start going all xenophobic on me.

Taxes are clearly Munger's best issue, and I think that could--if we can get him into a damn debate--bleed over some into Economy and Jobs.

One final question: will the spoiler avoidance effect hurt Michael? When it comes right down to it, if voting for Munger is perceived as costing the GOP the election, will Munger's 5% hold up? I don't know. But since he's actually gained ground in the past month, I'm cautiously hopeful.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...