Skip to main content

More on the Hope(less)* Commission

* Hat tip to longtime city activist and a good friend, Susan Regis Collins, for this apt moniker.

1. Today on delawaretalkradio.com Mike Matthews will be discussing the Wilmington Hope Commission on DownWithAbsolutes Radio from 3-5 pm. Mike has asked me to call in to discuss. I urge others to join in.

2. From Today's News-Journal - Wilmington City Council members call for police state tactics - demand police start "knocking heads" and "shaking down" criminal suspects, (presumably). Prado says civil liberties not his concern, invites litigation against the city as an acceptable price. Chief Sczerba wisely says civil liberties will not be tossed aside.

"
WILMINGTON -- Gunfire on Sunday afternoon killed one man, injured two and tied a 12-year-old record for most shootings in the city in a year." ###

"They need to do what they need to do and knock some heads," said Councilman Samuel Prado, D-5th District. "We need to go after these troublemakers. We can't let people hide behind civil liberties. I would worry about the civil liberties later, and let's get the situation under control first. If it means going to court, we'd better get a good lawyer."

[Hope Commissioner] Police Chief Michael Szczerba said the city would not sacrifice civil liberties to make more arrests.

"That won't happen," he said. "We can operate within the law just fine. We'll continue to police in the same aggressive, assertive manner that we have all along.

The first shooting happened when one man approached another man along Fourth Street, a busy thoroughfare through the city. They began talking. Moments later, the suspect pulled a handgun from his waistband and fired at least seven shots, hitting the victim twice in the chest.

Down Fourth Street, one of the bullets struck a second man, grazing his skull. His injury was not life-threatening and he was later released from the hospital.

The second shooting happened on the other side of the city, and police had few details to release Sunday evening.

[Hope Commissioner] Public Safety Director James Mosely said many officers already are walking the streets and he'd love to see more.

[Hope Commissioner] The Rev. Derrick Johnson, pastor of Joshua Harvest Church and a member of the anti-violence Wilmington Hope Commission, said he visited both shooting scenes Sunday to pray with neighbors and try to quell any talk of retaliation. Johnson said leaders must address poverty, drugs and other root causes of violence.

Prado and Councilman Kevin F. Kelley Sr., D-6th District, said they were disturbed by the brazen nature of the shootings, which happened on a warm autumn afternoon with many people around, unlike the majority of shootings, which happen at night.

"It says these criminals have no fear," Prado said.

Kelley joined Prado in calling for more aggressive policing. "You need to take Lancaster to Sixth and Union to Jackson and just lock that area down," Kelley said. "You need to start shaking people down and taking back the streets."

3. Nancy Willing has a round up of the issue over at Delaware Way, with some very thoughtful observations from Cassandra Marshall (cassandra m) of Delaware Liberal and a fiery letter to the News-Journal from my good friend Bob Dalton (of Wilmington sidewalk fight fame)

4. Call the Mayor's Office today (302) 576-2100 and leave a voice mail letting them know that he needs to shut down the wasteful "Hope" Commission and stop wasting taxpayer money on this nanny-crony boondoggle.


Comments

Brian Shields said…
Holy S#!t

I understand the frustration, but the extreme of locking down an area of a city is absolutely reprehensible. He was basically advocating creating a limited area police state because of an increase in crime.

Kudos to the Police Chief for understanding the limits of his power.

Sheesh.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...