Skip to main content

Why we need a Libertarian foreign policy...

... is made clear by this latest US violation of national sovereignty with [a helicopter strike into Syria]:

DAMASCUS, Syria (Oct. 26) – U.S. military helicopters launched an extremely rare attack Sunday on Syrian territory close to the border with Iraq, killing eight people in a strike the government in Damascus condemned as "serious aggression."

A U.S. military official said the raid by special forces targeted the foreign fighter network that travels through Syria into Iraq. The Americans have been unable to shut the network down in the area because Syria was out of the military's reach.

"We are taking matters into our own hands," the official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the political sensitivity of cross-border raids.

The attack came just days after the commander of U.S. forces in western Iraq said American troops were redoubling efforts to secure the Syrian border, which he called an "uncontrolled" gateway for fighters entering Iraq.

A Syrian government statement said the helicopters attacked the Sukkariyeh Farm near the town of Abu Kamal, five miles inside the Syrian border. Four helicopters attacked a civilian building under construction shortly before sundown and fired on workers inside, the statement said.

The government said civilians were among the dead, including four children.

A resident of the nearby village of Hwijeh said some of the helicopters landed and troops exited the aircraft and fired on a building. He said the aircraft flew along the Euphrates River into the area of farms and several brick factories. The witness spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information.


This is not only another example of Dubya's incredibly dangerous foreign policy, but dangerously consistent with the kinds of unilateral tactical interventions that both Senator JohnMcCain and Barack Obama have suggested they'd be willing to make.

Even more disturbing is that just hours ago the US was still denying the attacking forces had crossed the Syrian border:

Lieutenant-Colonel Chris Hughes, a spokesman for US forces in western Iraq, said the US division that operates on the Iraqi side of the border was not involved in the incident.

A Pentagon spokesman in Washington said he had no immediate information on the reported strike but would check further while the White House and CIA declined to comment.


Notice the nuance here. LTC Hughes denies that the US division that operates on the Iraqi side of the border was not involved in the incident, while later a US military spokesman admitted that special forces not accountable to the regional commander had conducted the raid. Clever wordplay, eh?

None of this can disguise that US conduct is becoming increasingly lawless its conduct of foreign policy, and nothing that's going to happen on November 4 stands to change this unless it's us--the American people.

Comments

Douglass said…
This resolution was passed by the membership of the Boston Tea Party at the national convention this weekend:

Whereas the United States of America has a military presence in over 130 countries and

Whereas in accordance with Article 1 Section 8, the Congress has not Declared War since 1942 and

Whereas such War ended in 1945

Be it RESOLVED that the Boston Tea Party calls for an immediate cease-fire of all military conflict and

Be it RESOLVED that the Boston Tea Party calls for an immediate removal of all military personnel from all foreign nations and

Be it RESOLVED that the Boston Tea Party calls for an immediate closure of all military bases in all foreign nations.
Anonymous said…
A cross border raid into Syria? Huh, the Hizbullah must have been cooking meth or something. No really, this is chilling, along the lines of the "secret" bombing of VC staging areas in Cambodia.

As for the BTP resolution, isn't that a unilateral abrogation of our treaty obligations? NATO is the most obvious one, but we have mutual defense and basing agreements around the world, like with Japan and Korea. I'm sorta new to this whole Libertarian thing, but is your party's underlying point that we're only permitted by the Constitution to maintain our forces within our own borders and sally forth only when attacked by a hostile state or states?
Anonymous said…
Mortgage-mart.com has been online since 1995, helping people find the florida mortgage that best suits their needs.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...