Skip to main content

You always knew that George Soros was a political mastermind, but I never suspected he was the world's largest drug dealer

These are actual excerpts from the speech by Calvina Fay of the Drug Free America Foundation at the World Forum Against Drugs. [h/t Drug War Rant]

I could not make this shit up.

As David Evans mentioned, In the United States, there is a very large and very well financed movement to normalize and legalize drug use and drug trafficking. Much of that movement is funded by a name that many of you know - George Soros, a convicted criminal who has publicly labeled himself as an atheist and yet has claimed that he is God...

Mr. Soros is about power and fame. His philosophy is to destroy societies that he does not like and then recreate them using his "open society" model. He destroys by creating chaos. And what better way to create chaos in society than to have a drug-addicted population that dominates. To have societies with drug-friendly laws and policies will certainly contribute to creating this chaos.
As in some other countries, Mr. Soros seeks to destroy our political system in the US and to create chaos in our judicial and law enforcement systems and even in our military.

He has contributed millions to the drug legalization movement as well as bought many of our politicians....

And speaking of getting well - let's talk a minute about the fraudulent campaigns to legalize marijuana as a so-called medicine. This illusion that has been created by the Soros minions that marijuana is a so-called medicine is a huge violation of human rights!

Truly sick people who deserve legitimate medical treatment have been duped into believing that marijuana will help them, while in reality it is hurting them. All because a special interest group is advancing a hidden agenda to normalize and legalize marijuana use. The sad thing is that people smoking pot probably do feel better even if they are not getting better but they could also feel better by smoking crack cocaine or injecting heroin. Will these be the next drugs to legalize as so-called medicine?


There are two brief things I want to say here:

1) If George Soros really is bankrolling drug legalization efforts, I owe him an apology for thinking he'd never done a damn thing I approved of in his life.

2) Thank God we have people in America like Steve Kubby.

Comments

Anonymous said…
As much as I support many of the initiatives you profess--here we part ways. Having worked in states where I could dispense THC, and did so gladly--the control still needs to be in place. If drug addiction mirrors at all what alcohol addiction has done to individuals, families, homes and society, then yes..regulation must prevail. The fall-out from this affects generations. The individual decision often yields a mass consequence. The unknown here is which person/user is responsible...and which person/user we end up being responsible for. This crap shoot isn't worth it to me, and I will yield to the feds and law.
tom said…
I knew there was a reason I liked /. where people who don't give a pseudonym post as "Anonymous Coward"
Terry Wright said…
Great stuff!

The speech by Calvina Fay is the epitome of how anti-drug groups operate. It is full of blatant lies and conspiracy theories. It is the best example yet of why these zealots fail to gather the support of rational people.
www.natalia.biz said…
Gosh, there is a great deal of worthwhile material above!

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...