Skip to main content

California's Cluster**** Is A View Into America's Future Under Obama

California is a microcosm of the federal state under the policies of Barack Obama.

When economic turmoil hit the tech and tourism economy in 2001 and 2002, California's answer was to increase spending and borrowing to "stimulate the economy." Government payrolls surged, new departments sprang up like weeds, regulations and tax increases choked commerce, and California became a pariah for the productive -- with the highest level of net outmigration of middle class workers of any state in the country (including basket cases like Michigan).

California, like Obama, believed that government could create "green jobs" with borrowed money.

California, like Obama, borrowed cash to spend on lavish public works projects.

California, like Obama, created "free" health care for everyone.

California, like Obama, made college "free" for most residents.

California, like Obama, increased taxes on "the rich," implemented environmental taxes on different classes of cars, penalized driving, and cranked up fares on public transit in the Bay Area once that became a monopoly form of transit for many commuters.

Fast forward to today -- California is bankrupt.

I received a letter from the state informing me that my estimated $2,000 tax refund will be delayed and effectively, I'll be getting an IOU from the state for the money.

State contractors, companies and individuals owed money by the state, and state employees will also be receiving IOUs -- many in lieu of paychecks.

Try as the Governator might, he cannot convince banks to take California IOUs as "same as cash" instruments. And nobody is lending money to California because, well, it's broke and unlikely to pay the money back.

California will probably demand, and receive, a large bailout from the rest of the country. It will probably blow through that and be back in crisis in a year or two, as the massive growth of the state's government continues to crush its poor citizens. It will likely persist in its deadbeat status for a long time.

But when America as a country reaches the same point, who will provide IT with a bailout?

You cannot continue spending trillions of dollars that you don't have and not eventually go broke. California is illustrative of that.

If Obama wants "change," he should start by changing his policies, which as implemented in California have led to the ruin of that once-dynamic economy.

Comments

Anonymous said…
"...he cannot convince banks to take California IOUs as "same as cash" instruments...."

Someone might litigate that there is a constitutional ban on states issuing paper currency.
Tyler Nixon said…
"You cannot continue spending trillions of dollars that you don't have and not eventually go broke."

I think spending trillions you don't have is the definition of being well past broke.

The problem is that they don't want to stop the runaway train from steaming ahead, until it derails into the big hole they have dug...right on top of all of us.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?