Skip to main content

Obama and Gitmo: Being damned for being responsible

OK, first off: Gitmo is a blight on America's honor and needs to be closed.

That having been said, President-elect Barack Obama is getting way too much shit from people about his statement that closing down Gitmo is complicated and won't be accomplished in 100 days.

What exactly did you expect him to do?

If he were to issue an Executive Order closing Gitmo in his first week, he'd have three choices of what to do with the prisoners:

1) Transport them to Federal holding facilities within the US. There is precedent for keeping people months and even years without charges--President Jimmy Carter did it with the Marielista boatlift prisoners, and Reagan, Bush, Clinton all quietly followed suit, leaving them to rot--primarily at Fort Chaffee Arkansas. But given that most of the folks at Gitmo have known identities and already have attorneys, that's not going to work.

2) Find other countries to take them as prisoners. Aside from the moral implications (rendition to countries with torture and no-due-process death penalties), there's the problem. Dubya has not been negotiating this, so Obama's State Department would have to start from scratch.

3) Release them. Aside from the dangers inherent with about 10-15% of these folks, where do you plan on releasing them? A lot were taken on battlefields in Iraq or Afghanistan, so releasing them there would require the agreement of those governments. Afghanistan actually has taken a large number of Gitmo prisoners back, but only on a case by case basis.

Point being: having said I will close Gitmo, the new President should enjoy a reasonable amount of time to make good his promise in a responsible manner. It is an inherently different proposition, I would suggest, than developing a strategy for dealing with Iran or Gaza, both of which are much higher priority national security concerns and won't go away.

Here's what Obama could do right now to silence his critics: issue an early Executive Order ending all enhanced interrogation techniques at Gitmo, extend Geneva Convention protections to the detainees there (there is a way to do this for captives who do not have a protecting power, and immediately open up the facility to international inspection.

And--to be perfectly honest--I expect his administration to take those steps pretty early. This is a campaign promise that I believe Barack Obama will keep.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Exile them to Gilligan's Island and let the Skipper handle them.
Anonymous said…
I've been to Fort Chaffee, and I'd have to say sending them there would constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba