Skip to main content

JFK and the F Bomb

The many audio recordings made by a brief span of U.S. presidents in the middle of last century are damn fascinating. Yet these recordings will likely stand as a brief anomaly of unparalleled insight, never again to be repeated in our history.

After Nixon, no president recorded anything (of which we know, anyway) in the way of their private meetings and phone conversations.

What we have from Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon are about as close as any of us will ever come to knowing first-hand how presidents interacted with others and how they operated in the inner recesses of the White House, out of the spotlight.

President Kennedy's are perhaps the most compelling listening, given how few recordings there are in total, how short his administration was, and of course his tragic murder at the peak of his political and personal prowess.

Here is a real gem in which Kennedy unleashes on AF General Godfrey McHugh over something rather trivial, which is what makes Kennedy's rather hyperbolic outrage so amusing. It shows how conscious Kennedy was of image and the mores of the time, but also a bit of how he probably didn't suffer bureaucratic fools gladly.

McHugh seems thunderstruck by Kennedy's profanity-laced tongue-lashing. All this over a photo of an Air Force officer posing next to Mrs. Kennedy's bed on Air Force One, one specially-bought for her during her pregnancy while in the White House.

Kennedy conflates the whole affair into a threat to Air Force funding, thundering "You just sank the Air Force budget!"

Great stuff...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...